Laserfiche WebLink
sm-m. OF cAaP6RNiA Pete Wilson, Governor <br />CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD <br />1020 Ninth Street, Suite 100s. <br />Sacramento, California 95814 <br />Lqmmw�vk3 <br />�1001� <br />R. t L <br />J U N 12 1991 <br />Ed Padilla, REHS ENVIRONMENIFAL HEAL'Tv,� <br />San Joaquin County <br />Public Health Services PERM IT/SERVICES <br />Environmental Health Division <br />P.O. Box 2009 <br />Stockton, California 95201 <br />Re: State Inspection <br />County Landfill (Corral Hollow <br />Facility No. 39 -AA -0005 <br />Dear Mr. Padilla: <br />he City of Tracy - San joaqui,n <br />Landf ill) <br />On April 11, 1991, a State Inspection Report (3/20/91) for the City <br />of Tracy - San Joaquin County Landfill was sent to your office. <br />This report noted an "area of concern" regarding the facility's <br />Periodic Site Review (Title 14, California Code of Regulations <br />(CCR), Section 17607). <br />On April 26, 1591, you contacted Brad Williams of Board staff and <br />pointed out that the State Inspection Report listed the site's <br />Periodic Site Review (PSR) as an "area of concern". You further <br />pointed out that the State Inspection Report made reference to a <br />PSR that is contained within the site's Report of Facility <br />Information (RFI) dated 12/88 (State Inspection Report, Facility <br />No. 39 -AA -0005, 3/20/91, page 1). You raised the following issue: <br />Why was an "area of concern" given for the PSR (14 CCR <br />17607) when a PSR had been completed in 12/88 and a five- <br />year time period would not require a new PSR,until 1993? <br />The 12/88 PSR for the Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill is <br />incorporated into the RFI for the site. An RFI is a working <br />document which describes actual site operations. The PSR is a <br />process that provides assurance to both your agency and the Board <br />that a facility operator receives recommendations from a registered <br />civil engineer that enhance site conditions based on conclusions <br />developed during an engineering review. The PSR should be a <br />separate and distinct document from an RFI. The PSR should be <br />developed prior to the revision of an RFI. These reports should be <br />prepared separately, even though some of the information and <br />sections might need to be duplicated. Each report should be a <br />"stand alone" document. <br />— Printed on Recycled Paper — <br />