Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 AT-�Ch #Lek I1 <br />S",�iTE OF CALIFORNIA Pete Wilson, Governor <br />;CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD <br />1020 Ninth Street, Suite 100 <br />Sacramento, California 95814 AQ <br />Ua E I V E D <br />AU G 1 9 1991 <br />ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br />PERMIT/SERVICES <br />Jack Vrmeer, Supervisor <br />Sonoma County Health Department <br />Environmental Health Services <br />1030 Center Drive, Suite A <br />Santa Rosa, CA 95403-2067 <br />Subject: Solid Waste Facilities Permit Procedure <br />Dear Mr. Vrmeer: <br />This letter is in response to your July 3, 1991 letter. In your <br />letter you ask for clarification on Boards policy regarding the <br />following: <br />Question 1 Does any change in a permit require complete and <br />total updating to current regulations? <br />Answer: Total updating of a permit is not required by law; <br />however it is strongly recommended. Statewide, <br />staff is trying to bring solid waste facilities <br />permits to a standardized minimum that is <br />described in the Board's Permit Desk Manual. To <br />date, Local Enforcement Agencies throughout the <br />state have incorporated contemporary permit <br />language when modifying revising or issuing new <br />solid waste facilities permit. <br />Question 2 Are comments using the word "should" optional for <br />compliance? <br />Answer: Board staff can only suggest permit language. <br />Please be advised, although this is suggested <br />language, staff can recommend objection to Board's <br />concurrence in a permit if staff finds the permit <br />language renders the permit unenforceable or in <br />conflict with current laws. The decision over <br />which language to include is ultimately up to each <br />Local Enforcement Agency. <br />-- Printed on Recycled Paper -- <br />