My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2012-2013
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREWERT
>
916
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0526865
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2012-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2021 12:17:34 PM
Creation date
2/2/2021 2:56:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2012-2013
RECORD_ID
PR0526865
PE
4443
FACILITY_ID
FA0018195
FACILITY_NAME
CENTRAL VALLEY COMPOST
STREET_NUMBER
916
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
FREWERT
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19126022
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
916 W FREWERT RD
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br /> Compliance History: <br /> WEEB staff in the Inspections and Enforcement Agency Compliance Unit conducted a pre- <br /> permit inspection on July 12, 2012, and found the facility to be in compliance with applicable <br /> state minimum standards. <br /> The facility has been operating under an EA Notification for the composting of green material <br /> since 2009. Over the last three years,there have been two violations documented by the LEA: <br /> • June, 2009 - 17868.3(b) Pathogen Levels Temperature Maintained and 17868.3(d) <br /> Temperature Monitoring. <br /> • December, 2009 - 17867(a)(5) Unauthorized Access. <br /> All of the violations were corrected to the satisfaction of the LEA. <br /> Environmental Analysis: <br /> Under CEQA,the Department must consider, and avoid or substantially lessen where possible, <br /> any potentially significant environmental impacts of the proposed SWFP before the Department <br /> concurs in it. In this case,the Department is a responsible agency under CEQA and must utilize <br /> the environmental document prepared by the San Joaquin County Community Development <br /> Department,Planning and Developmental Services, acting as the lead agency, absent changes in <br /> the project or the circumstances under which it will be carried out that justify the preparation of <br /> additional environmental documents and absent significant new information about the project, its <br /> impacts and the mitigation measures imposed on it. <br /> The proposed permit under consideration is to allow a solid waste facility to transfer, compost, <br /> store and process up to 500 tons per day of urban green waste with food scraps, green material <br /> and wood waste, permitted area of 20 acres and vehicle traffic volume of 75 trucks/vehicles per <br /> day. These project parameters are supported by the following environmental document. <br /> A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), State Clearinghouse (SCH)No. 2012022021,was <br /> adopted by the San Joaquin County Planning Commission on March 15, 2012, and a Notice of <br /> Detennination (NOD)was filed with the County Clerk on March 21, 2012. The project analysis <br /> concluded that there will be no significant impacts to the environment resulting from the project, <br /> due to mitigation measures proposed in the MND. Mitigation measures were incorporated into <br /> the project design and operation. The LEA has provided a finding that the MND describes and <br /> supports the design and operation, which will be authorized by the issuance of this permit. <br /> Staff recommends that the Department,acting as a Responsible Agency under CEQA,utilize the <br /> MND as prepared by the lead agency in that there are no grounds under CEQA for the <br /> Department to prepare a subsequent or supplemental environmental document or assume the role <br /> of Lead Agency for its consideration of the proposed new SWFP. Department staff has reviewed <br /> and considered the CEQA Findings adopted by the Lead Agency. Department staff further <br /> recommends the MND, together with the LEA CEQA finding, is adequate for the Branch Chiefs <br /> environmental evaluation of the proposed project for those project activities which are within the <br /> Department's expertise and/or powers, or which are required to be carried out or approved by the <br /> Department. <br /> The administrative record for the decision to be made by the Department includes the <br /> administrative record before the LEA,the proposed new SWFP and all of its components and <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.