My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0083128_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELM
>
7350
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0083128_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2022 8:08:03 AM
Creation date
2/19/2021 9:16:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0083128
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
STREET_NUMBER
7350
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
ELM
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
FRENCH CAMP
Zip
95336
APN
19311013
ENTERED_DATE
1/8/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
7350 S ELM ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
S = Sufficient <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 6.0 PERCOLATION TEST INFORMATION SECTION <br /> ❑ 6.1 Site map showing the location,with concise and accurate dimensions of the percolation test holes on the parcel. <br /> [� ❑ 6.2 The minimum number of shallow and deep percolation tests was performed for each parcel. <br /> ❑ 6.3 Description of the date,time and protocol used to prepare the test hole, including depth and dimensions of hole, <br /> preparation of hole, and depth of water used to presoak(minimum 12 inches). <br /> ❑ 6.4 Description of the date,time and condition of the test hole after the 24-hour soak period (hole still intact, hole dry, <br /> depth to water remaining in hole, etc.) <br /> ❑ 6.5 The test conformed to SJC Policy EHD 02-02(correct depth,diameter, 2"gravel, 6"water refill, correct readings <br /> recorded). <br /> a ❑ 6.6 Complete Percolation Test Form (including readings)was provided with REHS verification signature. The rate <br /> was correctly calculated using the last reading. <br /> []/ ❑ 6.7 Discussion of any potential problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or alternative septic system. <br /> [� ❑ 6.8 Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future leach fields needed at the site. <br /> 7.0 CONCLUSION SECTION <br /> []� ❑ 7.1 The re rt was signed and stamped by the appropriately registered individual <br /> Reviewed By: Reviewed Date: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.