My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013949
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
STEWART
>
2100
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
RIVER ISLAND DSEIR
>
SU0013949
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2021 1:39:33 PM
Creation date
2/22/2021 9:18:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013949
PE
2686
FACILITY_NAME
RIVER ISLAND DSEIR
STREET_NUMBER
2100
STREET_NAME
STEWART
City
LATHROP
Zip
95304-
APN
21325004
ENTERED_DATE
2/22/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2100 STEWART
RECEIVED_DATE
2/19/2021 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sshih
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
River Islands Development at Lathrop November 2020 <br /> Final Phase 2 Sewer Technical Report Rev 1 #6520 <br /> 5. River Islands Sewer Collection System Model <br /> 5.1 GIS Sewer Collection System Model <br /> ArcGIS, a geographic information system (GIS) software, was used to conduct a steady state analysis of <br /> the River Islands sewer collection system under ADWF and PWWF. A steady state analysis determines <br /> the operating performance of the sewer collection system at a specific point in time under steady state <br /> conditions (flows and hydraulic grades remain constant over time). The results of the steady-state analysis <br /> helped validate the following performance criteria of the River Islands sewer collection system. <br /> • Pipe capacities per the City Standards <br /> • Average Dry Weather Flows in each pipe <br /> • Peak Wet Weather Flow peaking factors in each pipe <br /> • Peak Wet Weather Flows in each pipe <br /> • Required firm pumping capacity for each sewer lift station. <br /> • Pipe Velocities under Peak Wet Weather Flows <br /> 5.2 GIS Sewer Collection System Model Basis and Assumptions <br /> The GIS model was created from a combination of as built drawings, issued for construction improvement <br /> plans, or preliminary sanitary sewer utility exhibits. The AutoCad drawings were imported into GIS to <br /> provide the following parameters of the model. <br /> • Location, slope, pipe size and length of the sewer lines <br /> • Location and inlet and outlet pipe invert elevations of the sanitary sewer manholes <br /> • Parcel size, land use, and corresponding sewer lines based on the location of the sewer laterals. <br /> As required by the City's Standards, the following baseline assumptions were used in the steady state <br /> analysis. <br /> • Pipe capacities and velocities for each pipe were determined utilizing a manning's coefficient(n)of <br /> 0.013 <br /> • Pipe capacities were determined at the maximum allowable flow depth listed in the City's Standards <br /> (see Table 4-1) <br /> • Peaking factors were determined based on each pipe segments ADWF. In other words, the <br /> peaking factors were higher at lower ADWF typically seen at the start of the collection system based <br /> on the City's Standard Detail S-1 (see Appendix D). <br /> 5.2.1 Areas Without Finalized Improvement Plans Assumptions <br /> In locations where improvement plans or as built drawings were not available, the following was assumed <br /> in order to conduct a steady state analysis. <br /> • The location of all sewer lines was assumed to match the preliminary sanitary sewer exhibits <br /> provided by Odell Engineering. <br /> o For Phase II, the location of the main trunk lines was provided by Odell Engineering. The <br /> location of the smaller lateral sewer lines was assumed in order to reasonably provide <br /> service to each applicable parcel. Sizes shown are based on the minimum requirements <br /> listed in the City's Standards. <br /> • The location of manholes was assumed to be at all pipe junctions or major turns. <br /> • The slope is assumed to remain constant in each individual pipe segment(between manholes) <br /> • The slope of each pipe is assumed to be minimum allowable slope listed in the City Standards <br /> (see Table 4-3) <br /> 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.