Laserfiche WebLink
DocuSign Envelope ID: 117C5B91-97C1-4BD1-9378-E46B8768498C <br /> Mr. Mark Meissner <br /> City of Lathrop <br /> April 13, 2020 <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br /> "Burrowing Owl Assessment and Avoidance: Prior to the initiation of Project activities, <br /> including ground disturbing work, the Qualified Biologist shall conduct surveys following the <br /> methodology described in Appendix D: Breeding and Non-breeding Season Surveys of the <br /> California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation <br /> (Staff Report), which is available at <br /> https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentlD=83843. <br /> In accordance with the CDFG 2012 Staff Report, a minimum of four survey visits should be <br /> conducted within 500 feet of the Project area during the owl breeding season which is <br /> typically between February 1 and August 31. A minimum of three survey visits, at least three <br /> weeks apart, should be conducted during the peak nesting period, which is between April 15 <br /> and July 15, with at least one visit after June 15. Pre-construction surveys should be <br /> conducted no-less-than 14 days prior to the start of construction activities with a final survey <br /> conducted within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance. Detected burrowing owls shall be <br /> avoided pursuant to the buffer zones prescribed in the CDFG 2012 Staff Report and any <br /> passive relocation plan shall be subject to CDFW review." <br /> Additionally, CDFW recommends that the City incorporate and implement measures to avoid or <br /> minimize the loss of burrowing owl nesting and/or foraging habitat. To offset loss of foraging <br /> habitat, CDFW recommends that the Project proponent should be required to purchase and <br /> protect in perpetuity compensatory mitigation lands at a minimum of a 1:1 mitigation ratio as a <br /> condition of Project approval. If active burrows or winter roosts are found onsite and take cannot <br /> be avoided, the mitigation ratio should be increased to a minimum of 3:1 (mitigation: loss). The <br /> long-term demographic consequences of exclusion techniques have not been thoroughly <br /> evaluated, and the survival rate of evicted or excluded owls is unknown. All possible avoidance <br /> and minimization measures should be considered before temporary or permanent exclusion and <br /> closure of burrows is implemented in order to avoid "take". <br /> Comment 5: Special-Status Plants <br /> CDFW recommends that the Project area be surveyed for special-status plants by a qualified <br /> botanist following the "Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special-Status Native <br /> Plant Populations and Natural Communities," which can be found online at <br /> https:Hwildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Survey-Protocols. This protocol, which is intended to <br /> maximize detectability, includes identification of reference populations to facilitate the likelihood <br /> of field investigations occurring during the appropriate floristic period. In the absence of <br /> protocol-level surveys being performed, additional surveys may be necessary. <br /> If a state-listed or state Rare' plant is identified during botanical surveys, consultation with <br /> CDFW is warranted to determine if the Project can avoid take. If take cannot be avoided, <br /> acquisition of take authorization through an ITP issued by CDFW pursuant to Fish and Game <br /> Code Sections 2081(b) and/or Section 1900 et seq is necessary to comply with Fish and Game <br /> Code CESA and the Native Plant Protection Act. <br /> 1 In this context, "Rare"means listed under the California Native Plant Protection Act. <br />