My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013949
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
STEWART
>
2100
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
RIVER ISLAND DSEIR
>
SU0013949
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2021 1:39:33 PM
Creation date
2/22/2021 9:18:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013949
PE
2686
FACILITY_NAME
RIVER ISLAND DSEIR
STREET_NUMBER
2100
STREET_NAME
STEWART
City
LATHROP
Zip
95304-
APN
21325004
ENTERED_DATE
2/22/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2100 STEWART
RECEIVED_DATE
2/19/2021 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sshih
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A <br /> A.' "k <br /> WOODARD <br /> &CURRAN <br /> proposed changes are not included in the water supply reliability evaluation of this WSA. However,Table 26 in Section <br /> 5.2 shows how future supply would be affected based on preliminary estimates made by SSJID and as noted above. <br /> 2.3.1.2 Water Quality Impacts on Reliability <br /> The SCWSP receives water from the Stanislaus River,which is considered to be of high quality prior to treatment and <br /> excellent quality following treatment at the DGWTP. The 2011 Stanislaus River Watershed Sanitary Survey, prepared <br /> by the Stanislaus/Calaveras River Group and Stockton East Water District, identified several potential sources of <br /> contamination in the upper Stanislaus River watershed (Stanislaus/Calaveras River Group and Stockton East Water <br /> District, 2011).These sources included recreational activities at Woodward Reservoir, confined animal facilities, cattle <br /> grazing, old septic systems, and wastewater disposal. Source control measures have been implemented to mitigate <br /> for these potential water quality threats. If water quality begins to degrade, SSJID will evaluate watershed management <br /> programs or modifications to the treatment process at the DGWTP. <br /> 2.3.2 Groundwater Supply Reliability <br /> The City currently relies upon groundwater produced from its four active wells (Wells 6, 7, 8 and 10) to meet its <br /> demands. In the future, the City is reviewing potential increased groundwater production by bringing Well 21 and Well <br /> 9 back online. <br /> As discussed in Section 2.1.2, the reliability of the City's groundwater supplies has historically been limited by water <br /> quality constraints.While groundwater quality constrains contribute to supply uncertainties,they are primarily an issue <br /> of treatability, rather than supply limitation. Further, the City has demonstrated the ability to modify its groundwater <br /> operations to adapt to changing water quality conditions. Therefore, the City is projecting to receive 100 percent of its <br /> current groundwater supplies in all year types.As SGMA is implemented in the Tracy Subbasin,the City's groundwater <br /> supply reliability may need to be re-evaluated. GSP developments can be evaluated during water supply verification if <br /> restrictions to groundwater supply are proposed. <br /> 2.3.2.1 Water Quality Impacts on Reliability <br /> One of the biggest threats to the City's ability to use groundwater to meet potable water demands is water quality.The <br /> primary water quality concerns in the City's groundwater are arsenic, manganese, uranium, TDS, groundwater <br /> contamination from industrial processes, and perfluorinated constituents of emerging concern. <br /> 2.3.2.1.1 Arsenic and Uranium <br /> Wells 6 through 8 and 10 are currently treated for arsenic at LAWTF, and the City is considering improving and <br /> expanding the Well 21 WTF to include treatment for arsenic.Well 21 has also experienced elevated concentrations of <br /> uranium. <br /> The presence of naturally occurring arsenic and uranium in the groundwater underlying the City impacts the reliability <br /> of the City's groundwater supply. Expansion of groundwater production in the future is limited by the costs associated <br /> with treatment and the availability of adequate supplies to conduct blending. <br /> 2.3.2.1.2 Total Dissolved Solids <br /> The City's groundwater supply reliability is also impacted by the migration of groundwater with TDS concentrations in <br /> excess of the secondary MCL of 500 mg/L(the recommended limit for aesthetic considerations such as odor and taste), <br /> a factor which may make the planned wellfield near Well 21 infeasible due to the potential for expanded pumping to <br /> induce the migration of high TDS water of greater concentration than currently present at the well site.Wells 6 through <br /> 10 are located immediately east of groundwater with high TDS concentrations, based on water quality data from City <br /> wells and sampling and analysis data from both shallow and deep monitoring wells collected by private entities (SGI, <br /> Califia(0011533.00) 28 Woodard&Curran, Inc. <br /> River Islands Phase 2 Development Water Supply Assessment September 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.