My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0083281_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
POCK
>
3657
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0083281_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2021 9:54:40 AM
Creation date
3/3/2021 9:44:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0083281
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
3657
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
POCK
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
17914004
ENTERED_DATE
2/16/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
3657 S POCK LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
S = Sufficient <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 6.0 PERCOLATION TEST INFORMATION SECTION <br /> [f ❑ 6.1 Site map showing the location,with concise and accurate dimensions of the percolation test holes on the parcel. <br /> [R ❑ 6.2 The minimum number of shallow and deep percolation tests was performed for each parcel. <br /> EY ❑ 6.3 Description of the date,time and protocol used to prepare the test hole, including depth and dimensions of hole, <br /> preparation of hole,and depth of water used to presoak(minimum 12 inches). <br /> Q ❑ 6.4 Description of the date,time and condition of the test hole after the 24-hour soak period (hole still intact, hole dry, <br /> depth to water remaining in hole, etc.) <br /> ❑ 6.5 The test conformed to SJC Policy EHD 02-02(correct depth,diameter, 2"gravel,6"water refill, correct readings <br /> recorded). <br /> ❑ 6.6 Complete Percolation Test Form (including readings)was provided with REHS verification signature. The rate <br /> was correctly calculated using the last reading. <br /> ❑ 6.7 Discussion of any potential problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or alternative septic system. <br /> [ ❑ 6.8 Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future leach fields needed at the site. <br /> 7.0 CONCLUSION SECTION <br /> [R"" ❑ 7.1 The report was signed and stamped by the appropriately registered individual <br /> Reviewed By: n��tf�— i ,yf)ew Reviewed Date: 76Z( <br /> Pana 7 of—! c..a c..:...ti:c...�.,.,.i.c... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.