My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CO0048503 (3)
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
13550
>
4200 – Liquid Waste Program
>
CO0048503 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:47:15 PM
Creation date
3/5/2021 11:43:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4200 – Liquid Waste Program
RECORD_ID
CO0048503
PE
4200
STREET_NUMBER
13550
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
LODI
Zip
95242
APN
05502002
ENTERED_DATE
1/23/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
13550 W HWY 12
RECEIVED_DATE
1/23/2019 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\ymoreno
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
is dependent for utilities upon a continuous utility linkage to a source originating on shore, and <br />has a permanent, continuous hookup to a shoreside sewage system. <br />It appears that under the DMV regulation a structure that has, or is designed to have, a mode of power on its <br />own, is not dependent for utilities upon a continuous utility linkage to a source originating on shore, and does <br />not require a permanent, continuous hookup to a shoreside sewage system falls under the DMV definition of a <br />vessel. <br />The SC Ruling is somewhat less specific, than the CA State Codes, in that it imposes a "reasonable observer" <br />test, but, importantly, not only does it concur with Cal. Health & Safety Code Ann. §18075.55(d)), it also <br />mentions the same criteria for a lack of self propulsion, dependence on shore services, etc. as being <br />characteristics of the "behavior" of a structure that would lead that reasonable observer to conclude that a <br />structure was a floating home and not a vessel. We note that many conventional houseboats (vessels) in <br />operation in the Delta do not have "raked hulls", and include many of the elements that the SC asserts are also <br />associated with a home (boxy shape, conventional non-water tight windows, sliding doors, and interior rooms, <br />for example), yet they are still considered houseboats. The key distinguishing elements are self-propulsion, <br />self-contained electrical capability, and self-contained water and sewage facilities, so that the houseboat can <br />be reasonably operated on the water to transport people or goods. <br />Given the above, we therefore propose that a conversion of the existing floating homes to vessel status would <br />meet the intent of the "reasonable observer" test and CA State Code by the following set of modifications: <br />Attachment of a steerable outboard motor on a suitable mount to provide self- propulsion <br />Provision of on-board electrical storage, together with facility (e.g. a power inverter) to provide <br />operation of the basic electrical systems of the vessel when disconnected from shore power <br />Fitting of a USCG approved marine toilet and a USCG approved holding tank, and removal of any facility <br />for continuous connection to a shore-side sewage system <br />Installation of a self-contained water storage and delivery system to provide water to on-board <br />facilities when not connected to a shore-side water source. <br />Installation of navigation lights, fire extinguishers, safety equipment (PFDs), placards, and emergency <br />devices to USCG standards. <br />Registration as a vessel with the CA DMV(including CF numbers and registration tags), or <br />documentation as a vessel by the USCG. <br />We note that under Cal. Health & Safety Code Ann. §18075.55(d)), and CA Vehicle Code §§9840, 9871.5 and <br />Harbors and Navigation Code §651, any of items 1, 2, or 3 above would technically suffice to render the <br />structure a vessel under CA law, but in the spirit of meeting the SC "reasonable observer" test, we are <br />proposing to implement all of these modifications plus a few others (on-board water, navigation lights, etc). <br />We believe that with these modifications, the floating homes would fall under the definition of "vessel" as <br />defined by both CA statutes, and would include the key structural and behavioral attributes outlined and <br />intended by the US Supreme Court as differentiating a vessel from a floating home. <br />We look forward to receive your comments and to meet with you in person to resolve this matter. In the <br />meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any further questions or need clarifications. <br />Respectfully, <br />i <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.