Laserfiche WebLink
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> In summary, the soil conditions examined near the existing septic system drain fields <br /> were found to be suitable for standard, shallow septic systems utilizing leach lines, <br /> leach lines with sumps, or filter beds. <br /> Satisfactory soil percolation rates of 5.56 min/in (Parcel 1) and 4.17 min/in (Parcel 2) <br /> were observed at the test locations. The soils in the test locations were found to be silty <br /> sand with clay (Parcel 1) and silty sand (Parcel 2). The percolation tests are considered <br /> representative of an area approximately 100 feet in radius. <br /> The depth of ground water based on recent aquifer levels is approximately 43 to 51 feet <br /> below ground surface. The ground-water flow is to the northwest at a rate of <br /> approximately 5 feet per mile in the vicinity of the Site. <br /> Water samples were collected from the both domestic wells on the Site as part of this <br /> investigation. Nitrate was detected in the sample from the southern well at a <br /> concentration of 9.6 mg/L-N, below the MCL of 10 mg/L-N. DBCP was detected at a <br /> concentration of 0.02 ug/L, below the MCL of 0.2 ug/L. In the sample from the northern <br /> well, nitrate was detected at 18.9 mg/L-N (above the MCL), and DBCP was detected at <br /> 0.01 ug/L (below the MCL). It is recommended that the residents at the northern house <br /> consume bottled water until the nitrate level can be brought down below the MCL. The <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department should be contacted for <br /> recommendations about water filtration. <br /> Based on the methods and assumptions described, the nitrate loading calculation <br /> indicates that the use of on-site septic tanks and drain field systems on the Site has the <br /> potential to cause a buildup of nitrate in the aquifer up to 7.8 mg/L for Parcel 1 and 1.5 <br /> mg/L-N for Parcel 2; both results are below the maximum drinking water standard of 10 <br /> mg/L-N. Because of the favorable results of the nitrate loading calculations, no nitrate <br /> mitigation is recommended at this time. <br /> LOGE 2111 Page 15 <br />