Laserfiche WebLink
e . <br /> Monitoring Report Complianceih cklist 4 <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A Reviewer Comment <br /> WDRs u. Is there a summary of the monitoring X <br /> Standard results indicating any changes made <br /> Provisions or observed since the previous annual <br /> (1993,1997,2000) report? <br /> X <br /> v. Is there an evaluation of the <br /> effectiveness of the leachate <br /> monitoring/control facilities? <br /> X <br /> Standard w. Is there a discussion about the <br /> Provisions annual LCRS testing and a <br /> (April 2000) comparison to earlier testing9 <br /> or check WDRs <br /> Compliance achieved? (check one) Yes x No <br /> If Yes, check all issues that apply and provide comments: <br /> Incomplete transmittal letter Comments (to be entered into SWIM <br /> Incomplete report(s) <br /> Inadequate monitoring program <br /> New release <br /> Inadequate response to evidence of a release <br /> WDRs violation other than listed above <br /> Other(explain in comments) <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> Table 1. Please include the last calculated concentration limit for each constituent if a new limit is not established due <br /> to the three criteria listed in Table 1 as not established (1)due to>50%non-detects, (2)due to statistically significant <br /> trend,or(3)insufficient data. <br /> Five year review shall be reported in the 4t'Quarter 2004 report. <br /> Increasing constituents in MW-4 and MW-5. Hexavalent chromium was detected in both new wells MW-6 and MW-7 <br /> above the water quality objective of 50 ppb. The levels were 58 and 7.5 ppb,respectively. Based on this information, <br /> we require an Engineering Feasibility Study for Corrective Action per Title 27 CCR Section 20430 be submitted to <br /> address these releases to groundwater. <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: <br /> Date: zy <br />