My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0083459_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
POCK
>
2721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0083459_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2021 11:06:09 AM
Creation date
4/2/2021 11:00:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0083459
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
2721
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
POCK
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
17912003
ENTERED_DATE
3/24/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2721 S POCK LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mass Transport Soil Properties <br /> The percolation test has revealed that the soils in the test area are moderately <br /> permeable and will allow some infiltration of water. The longer the effluent remains near <br /> the surface, the more biologic treatment may occur. If permeable soils exist to the depth <br /> of the ground-water aquifer, it is possible that any remaining surface contaminants may <br /> be transported to the first saturated zone of the aquifer. <br /> Clay soils, like those found on this Site, tend to inhibit downward movement of nitrate <br /> due to adsorption of the nitrate ions to the soil. <br /> Sources of Nitrate <br /> Dairies, orchards that require fertilization in sandy soils, and septic systems have been <br /> found to be the most significant sources of nitrate in ground water. <br /> Percolating Recharge Waters <br /> One of the most determinant factors in the Hantzsche and Finnemore equation is the <br /> rate of recharge from percolating waters, which mix with the downward-percolating <br /> effluent generated by on-site septic systems. In the original Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> paper, "average recharge rate of rainfall" was utilized. <br /> Based on San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department policy (personal <br /> communication, March 18, 2019), the recharge input for the Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> equation should be derived from average monthly precipitation of rainfall and <br /> evapotranspiration rates for the area; the data should be obtained from the California <br /> Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS). Recharge is calculated by first <br /> determining whether the average monthly precipitation exceeds average monthly <br /> potential evapotranspiration. If so, then the difference is the percolating recharge water <br /> into the aquifer. Runoff and stream infiltration drainage are not factored into the <br /> calculation. This approach likely under-estimates recharge to the aquifer and, <br /> consequently, over-estimates nitrate loading. <br /> The Site is located closest to the CIMIS Manteca station. Data from the Manteca <br /> station were available for 2014 through 2020; based on the calculation shown, the <br /> estimated rate of recharge from percolating waters for the Manteca station is <br /> determined to be 3.23 inches (Plate 12). A statistical error of 58 percent is associated <br /> with this value. <br /> Quality of Rainwater <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore listed 1 mg/L-N as the nitrate concentration of rainwater for <br /> their original calculation; in the past, Live Oak has also utilized this value for the nitrate <br /> loading calculation. <br /> LOGE 2115 Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.