Laserfiche WebLink
Port of Stockton Bulk Tern - 2 - 6 June 2006R <br />Ground Water Investigation and <br />Feasibility Study <br />Contaminated soils that pose a significant risk to groundwater or surface water must be <br />remediated. The remediation plan should establish soil cleanup levels and a procedure <br />for removal or isolation of soils that are a threat to water quality. The remediation of <br />sulfur polluted soils would also make the monitoring option in the Feasibility Study more <br />likely to succeed, because much of the source of the pollution has been removed. A <br />soil remediation plan is required. <br />No investigation was done to determine if the sulfur storage areas themselves are a <br />potential source of the detected groundwater pollution. The stormwater runoff and any <br />other liquid in the storage areas are a designated waste and therefore the storage area <br />must meet the performance standards of Title 27 California Code of Regulations, <br />Division 2 (Title 27). An evaluation of sulfur storage areas and their potential threat to <br />water quality is required. <br />The recommend remedial alternative of monitoring seems to have no objectives or <br />remedial goals besides to monitor the extent of the groundwater contamination. <br />Remedial action trigger language is required to determine when the proposed remedial <br />alternative of recent facility improvements and monitoring has failed and further action <br />is required. <br />The proposed groundwater monitoring system for the remedial alternative needs <br />additional wells to adequately monitor groundwater both upgradient and downgradient <br />of the individual sulfur facilities, and to monitor the conveyer area. Attached is Figure <br />10 from the report showing proposed additions to the monitoring system. Monitoring <br />well B1 would be upgradient of H.J. Baker and B2 downgradient. B3 would monitor the <br />conveyer belt area. We also proposed to move MW-5 south so it is less likely to be <br />affected by H.J. Baker and be an upgradient well to Bay sulfur. The monitoring plan <br />should be changed and implemented this summer. <br />Submit a report addressing the above concerns and issues by 15 July 2006. The report <br />should include a schedule to complete each task. All soils cleanup should be completed <br />before 2006-2007 rain season and the monitoring wells installed. If you have any question, <br />please call me at (916) 464-4626 or e-mail me at vizzo@waterboards.ca.gov , <br />/ <br />VICTOR J(IZZO <br />Senior Engineering Geologist <br />cc: Margaret Lagorio, San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department, Stockton <br />Mr. Jeffrey Wingfield, Jones and Stokes, C/O Port of Stockton, Stockton <br />Nicole Granquist, Downey Brand, LLP, Sacramento <br />Mr. Zachary Walton, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky and Walker, LLP, San Francisco <br />Charels F. Timms, Broiles & Timms, LLP <br />Mr. Peter Weiler, ERS Corporation, Walnut Creek <br />INITIALS/Dnve\Folder\DocumentName