Laserfiche WebLink
Jay R. Jahangiri, M.S., REM, J.EA <br />President and Environmental Health and Safety Director <br />TRE Consulting <br />Central Valley: 6333 Pacific Ave #286 <br />Stockton, CA 95207 <br />Phone: 209-601-7048 <br />Phone: 925-639-4499 <br />Fax: 925-932-8634 <br />E-Mail: TRECONSULTING@attbi <br /> Original Message <br />From: "Mike Infurna [EH]" <MInfurna@sjcehd.com> <br />To: "Jay Jahangiri" <TRECONSULTING@attbi.com> <br />Cc: <CohenW@rb5s.swrcb.ca.gov> <br />Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:18 AM <br />Subject: RE: Sampling of the Monitoring Wells on Thursday June 12, 2003 <br />Jay, I have just spoken with Wendy Cohen this morning before she had to step <br />out. We both agreed that the 'baseline' analyses utilized back in 1991 <br />should be repeated in this proposed, Thursday sampling event. A comparison <br />of the same chemicals should be conducted. With the exception that Nickel <br />analysis be added, both the CVRWQCB and EHD would consider this approach to <br />be the plan to be followed. If you agree, then you may sample on Thursday. <br />Without data from a complete 'comparative' sampling event, conclusions for <br />Metropolitan Stevedore's involvement or not in impacting the groundwater <br />could not be supported. Conducting an 'incomplete' sampling event at this <br />time could prove to be costly and inadequate. <br /> Original Message <br />From: Jay Jahangiri [mailto:TRECONSULTING@attbi.com] <br />Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 5:26 PM <br />To: Wendy Cohen <br />Cc: CMPRGCEGHG@aol.com; Norman Hauser; Al Gamier; Leif Gistrand; Thomas <br />Mogan; Catherine Hall-Kanellis; Mike Infurna [EH] <br />Subject: Re: Sampling of the Monitoring Wells on Thursday June 12, 2003 <br />Importance: High <br />Hi Wendy: <br />The 1991 report is appended (appendices A and B) to the monitoring well <br />repair and condition report which was sent to your office in early May, <br />2003. Please let me know if you can not find it and I will be happy to send <br />you another set. <br />Relative to adding nickel and arsenic to the COC list, our concern is <br />that to our knowledge, MSC has not engaged in any industrial activities that <br />would necessitate including nickel and arsenic in our COC list. Our concern <br />stems from the fact that the Port of Stockton has been an industrial complex <br />for the past 80 plus years which has had multiple industrial users/entities <br />prior to and concurrent with MSC's activities. Hence, sampling and <br />analyzing for COC that are unrelated to MSC's past and present activities <br />would only create grounds for a technical quagmire for addressing COC which <br />have had nothing to do with MSC's operations on site. <br />I would have to notify MSC's management of your request so we can <br />further discuss this matter. Relative to adding sulfur, MSC does not store <br />sulfur in its own operations. MSC only conveys sulfur via an integrated <br />conveyor system which is equipped with BMPs and P2 features that meet or <br />exceed BAT/BCT. Hence, adding sulfur to our COC list would also have to be <br />broached with MSC's management and discussed accordingly. <br />At this late stage, I would have to cancel our field sampling for this <br />Thursday, until we can address your requests. Stay tuned. <br />2