Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Infurna [EH] <br />From: Jay Jahangiri [TRECONSULTING@attbi.com] <br />Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 5:26 PM <br />To: Wendy Cohen <br />Cc: CMPRGCEGHG©aol.com; Norman Hauser; Al Gamier; Leif Gistrand; Thomas Mogan; <br />Catherine Hall-Kanellis; Mike Infurna [EH] <br />Subject: Re: Sampling of the Monitoring Wells on Thursday June 12, 2003 <br />Importance: High <br />NOKKI1/41 <br />Hi Wendy: <br />The 1991 report is appended (appendices A and B) to the monitoring well <br />repair and condition report which was sent to your office in early May, <br />2003. Please let me know if you can not find it and I will be happy to send <br />you another set. <br />Relative to adding nickel and arsenic to the COC list, our concern is <br />that to our knowledge, MSC has not engaged in any industrial activities that <br />would necessitate including nickel and arsenic in our COC list. Our concern <br />stems from the fact that the Port of Stockton has been an industrial complex <br />for the past 80 plus years which has had multiple industrial users/entities <br />prior to and concurrent with MSC's activities. Hence, sampling and <br />analyzing for COC that are unrelated to MSC's past and present activities <br />would only create grounds for a technical quagmire for addressing COC which <br />have had nothing to do with MSC's operations on site. <br />I would have to notify MSC's management of your request so we can <br />further discuss this matter. Relative to adding sulfur, MSC does not store <br />sulfur in its own operations. MSC only conveys sulfur via an integrated <br />conveyor system which is equipped with BMPs and P2 features that meet or <br />exceed BAT/BCT. Hence, adding sulfur to our COC list would also have to be <br />broached with MSC's management and discussed accordingly. <br />At this late stage, I would have to cancel our field sampling for this <br />Thursday, until we can address your requests. Stay tuned. <br />Best Regards <br />Jay <br /> Original Message <br />From: "Wendy Cohen" <CohenW@rb5s.swrcb.ca.gov> <br />To: <TRECONSULTING@attbi.com›; <MInfurna@sjcehd.com> <br />Cc: <CMPRGCEGHG@aol.com> <br />Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:32 PM <br />Subject: Re: Sampling of the Monitoring Wells on Thursday June <br />Jay, <br />Dissolved nickel needs to be included in the analytes based on <br />discussions with Regional Board stormwater staff. Mike and I may have <br />additional analytes when we are able to discuss this on Tuesday, <br />possibly arsenic and sulfur, which were original constituents of <br />concern. I never received the 1991 report that you agreed to send me. <br />1