My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1992-1993
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
14750
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440007
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1992-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2021 4:34:37 PM
Creation date
5/7/2021 8:39:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1992-1993
RECORD_ID
PR0440007
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0000595
FACILITY_NAME
HARNEY LANE LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
14750
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06503006
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
14750 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Horton <br /> Page 3 <br /> Clay Cap Construction Design - The lack of adequate clayey <br /> soils at Harney Lane requires the County to mix local soil <br /> with imported clay to produce an admixture capable of <br /> passing the permeability tests. The CQA plan provides two <br /> options to perform the mixing. one is to spread the <br /> imported clay over a thick lift of native soil, mix with <br /> large rotor-tilling equipment, then compact in place. The <br /> alternative mixing method is to use a mixing table <br /> arrangement where the two soils are mixed in a specified <br /> area (the 'mixing table' ) then transported to the cap area <br /> for compaction. As described by Kleinfelder in the CQA <br /> plan, the in-place mixing process raises serious doubts <br /> regarding the County's (or any subcontractor's) ability to <br /> achieve a homogeneous, low permeability cap and provide <br /> adequate construction documentation. For the reasons <br /> described below, the Regional Water Board requests that the <br /> County prohibit the use of in-place mixing and instead use a <br /> mixing table system to prepare the clay admixture. <br /> Regional Water Board staff have observed construction of a <br /> clay barrier layer at another landfill using rotor-tillers. <br /> In that case the mixing process resulted in a heterogeneous <br /> mixture of clay clods and native soil. This was due to an <br /> attempt to mix Ione clay and native soils at a moisture <br /> content which was too high for rotor-tillers to be effective <br /> mixers. The goal of mixing is to achieve a homogeneous <br /> distribution of the clay and the native soil. <br /> Moisture Content - Moisture content is specified at three <br /> percent (3%) over optimum. Kleinfelder indicated that three <br /> percent (3%) over optimum at 95% compaction will result in a <br /> liner with acceptable permeability. A range of acceptable <br /> moisture contents must be specified. Otherwise, CQA <br /> personnel will not know when clay is in an acceptable <br /> condition for installation. The rationale for this range <br /> must also be given. <br /> Borrow Area Soil Tests - The CQA plan includes a summary of <br /> permeability tests on borrow area soils mixed with Ione clay <br /> (Table 2-1) . The Regional Water Board Staff is concerned <br /> that these laboratory permeabilities are so close to the <br /> regulatory requirements that small variations in mixing <br /> ratios, moisture content or compactive effort in the field <br /> may cause the finished liner to fail CQA testing. As <br /> Kleinfelder notes, there is not much cushion in the lab test <br /> results. Experience indicates typical construction <br /> techniques result in field permeabilities that are 10 to loo <br /> times higher than lab results. Given this relationship, a <br /> conservative interpretation of the results shown on Table <br /> 2-1 suggests that only one of eight samples tested (Sample <br /> 6) will meet the field permeability requirement. <br /> Kleinfelder recommends increasing the imported clay content <br /> from 15% as used in the laboratory tests to 20% in the <br /> field. This is a good recommendation, however, no test data <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.