My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013675_STAFF REPORT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DELTA
>
7300
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1800316
>
SU0013675_STAFF REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2021 4:06:51 PM
Creation date
5/13/2021 3:51:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
STAFF REPORT
RECORD_ID
SU0013675
PE
2625
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1800316
STREET_NUMBER
7300
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DELTA
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
TRACY
Zip
95304-
APN
21302038, 21302041
ENTERED_DATE
10/6/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
7300 W DELTA AVE
RECEIVED_DATE
10/5/2020 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
EHIntern
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Giuseppe Sanfilippo <br /> San Joaquin County Planning Commission <br /> Re. Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for Use Permit No.PA-1800316 of Ahmed <br /> Hussein(c/o Shack&Company) <br /> August 6,2020 <br /> Page 4 <br /> condition of approval is included in the Revised IS/ND. Additionally,in its January 17,2019 <br /> comment letter on the IS/MND,the Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB) <br /> identified a number of applicable regulatory requirements,including waste discharge <br /> requirements and compliance with the Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program;a mitigation <br /> measure should be included to require compliance with this program and all permits identified <br /> by the RWQCB. A mitigation measure also should be included requiring documentation of <br /> how the revised MMP complies with the San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department Confined Animal Facility Manure/Solid Waste Management Plan Guidance <br /> Document. Finally,the Revised IS/ND should be amended to include a mitigation measure <br /> requiring that the owner consult with the State Water Resources Control Board and,if <br /> necessary,obtain an Industrial Storm Water Permit,and comply with all conditions of any <br /> such permit. <br /> IV. The Revised IS/ND Does Not Adequately Resolve Questions About Potentially <br /> Significant Impacts to Public Health and Safety and District Facilities from Vectors <br /> There is insufficient information in the Revised IS/ND to demonstrate that the Project <br /> will not result in potentially significant impacts from vectors,including rodents,which may <br /> pose a risk to public health and safety from disease,as well as potential degradation of <br /> District levees from burrowing rodents. The Revised IS/ND must be amended to identify <br /> specific requirements of the County Mosquito and Vector Control District(Vector Control <br /> District)and the California Health and Safety Code that apply to the Project and explain how <br /> those requirements will avoid significant impacts. To ensure that impacts from vectors will <br /> not be significant,at a minimum,the Revised IS/ND must be amended to include a mitigation <br /> measure requiring the applicant to consult with the Vector Control District,provide <br /> documentation of applicable requirements,and comply with all applicable requirements. The <br /> MMRP should require that the applicant provide proof of such consultation and ongoing proof <br /> of compliance with applicable requirements. <br /> V. The Revised IS/ND Does Not Address Potential Impacts to the District's Water <br /> Conveyance Facilities <br /> As indicated in Revised Site Plan(Exhibit B),a District-owned,operated,and <br /> maintained irrigation pipeline rims along the south side of the Project boundary,and a District <br /> drainage canal runs along the north side of the Project boundary. It does not appear that the <br /> Project proposes to locate buildings or other facilities in proximity to the District facilities. <br /> However,to ensure that District facilities are not damaged,and that the District retains access <br /> to this critical public infrastructure,a condition of approval should be included requiring the <br /> applicant dedicate a 30-foot easement for the District pipeline and a 60-foot easement for the <br /> District drainage canal,measured from the center of the pipeline and canal. The conditions of <br /> Planning Commission Staff Report, PA-1800316(UP) 83 <br /> Response Letters <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.