Laserfiche WebLink
BILL DUCKENFIELD 2 24 July 1991 <br /> PRETREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT MONITORING <br /> You have requested a change in the Pretreatment Plant Effluent Monitoring from <br /> BODS to COD and made reference to published material written by Metcalf & <br /> Eddy. Although no supporting documentation was included with the Nolte <br /> proposal , we will revise this part of the monitoring program since you are no <br /> longer discharging to the Mokelumne River. If in the future Victor discharges <br /> to Mokelumne River, then it is likely that Regional Board NPDES staff will <br /> require Victor to resume BODS sampling of the effluent. <br /> EXTRACTED GROUND WATER MONITORING <br /> We will reduce the general minerals to an annual sampling event and the <br /> specific minerals identified in your letter will be sampled quarterly. <br /> EQUALIZATION/EMERGENCY STORAGE BASIN MONITORING <br /> Except for reporting the freeboard in the EESB and two vadose zone sampling <br /> events, Victor has not submitted any further information required by RM&RP No. <br /> 90-047. Annual LCRS Testing and weekly synthetic liner inspections are <br /> required and no monitoring reports submitted to date include any results or <br /> demonstrate that any of the monitoring is being conducted. These <br /> noncompliance issues were identified in a 1 May 1991 Notice of Violation <br /> letter. <br /> LCRS Leachate Monitoring <br /> Victor has not submitted any information to suggest that any leachate <br /> generation has occurred. We can assume either that no leachate generation has <br /> occurred or that Victor has not been sampling according to RM&RP No. 90-047. <br /> If there is no leachate in the LCRS, then there is no need to sample or reduce <br /> the sampling frequency in a detection monitoring program that is not currently <br /> being utilized. Consequently, there will be no change in the constituents or <br /> the sampling frequency until leachate generation occurs and enough samples <br /> have been collected to justify a modification in the monitoring program. <br /> Vadose Zone Monitoring <br /> In your 2 May 1991 letter, you state, "In the past year, quarterly vadose zone <br /> monitoring has now established the baseline water quality. . . ". First, only <br /> two of the required four quarterly vadose zone sampling event results have <br /> been submitted as required by RM&RP No. 90-047 to determine the Water Quality <br /> Protection Standards (WQPS) . Second, since the WQPS have not been established <br /> for the vadose zone at this site, then it is not possible to conclude whether <br /> or not there has been a statistically significant increase over WQPS. <br /> As stated in our 1 May 1991 letter, Victor must determine if there is a <br /> statistically significant increase over WQPS and demonstrate correlations or <br /> trends that supports a reduction in sampling constituents before we will <br /> consider revising the monitoring program. It should be noted that Article 5 <br /> of Chapter 15, Title 23, California Code Of Regulations which became effective <br /> 1 July 1991 provides specific direction for developing WQPS and determining if <br /> there has been statistically significant increase over WQPS. <br />