Laserfiche WebLink
�. California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> Central Valley Region aSteven T.Butler,Acting Chair Gray Davis <br /> Winston H.Hickoz Sacramento Main Office Governor <br /> Secretaryfor Internet Address: hapJ/wwwsvrrb.cagov/-.rwgcb5 <br /> Enveronrnental 3443 Routier Road,Suite A.Sacramento,Caiifomia 95927-3003 <br /> Protection Phone(916)255-3000.FAX(916)255-3015 <br /> 26 April 1999 <br /> Mr. Patrick D. Riddle <br /> Attorney at Law <br /> 7574 Shoreline Drive <br /> Stockton, CA 95219 <br /> PROPOSAL FOR GROUNDWATER REMEDIATIONAT VICTOR FINE FOODS, SAN JOAQUIN <br /> COUNTY <br /> We met with you and your consultant on 15 March 1999 to discuss the new groundwater data collected <br /> at the site and your proposal for groundwater remediation using natural attenuation. You asked us to <br /> provide you with staff s impressions of this information. ��el�edoes S� Due ou will the pe tpublic <br /> S low. <br /> interest in this site, we are also providing copies to <br /> During a recent telephone conversation, our staff counsel, Lori Senitte,informed you that we would be <br /> doing so. <br /> you indicated that you were representing the Goehring family and that <br /> At the 15 March 1999 meeting,y aced on discussions at the <br /> the data(provided in a draft report) and the natural attenuation proposal (b e n a cu 1999 tax sale. <br /> meeting) were generated to determine the feasibility of purchasing this property y <br /> We are encouraged by the Goehring's interest in this property and would like to work with you, or any <br /> other party interested in the site, to develop a cleanup appeooaabh les us o de�r�in if naot water quality <br /> is <br /> and realistic. However, neither the data nor the proposal <br /> a viable remedial alternative at this site. To determine whether a natural attenuation option would be <br /> acceptable at this site, we would need the following information: <br /> ♦ The vertical and lateral extent of the plume needs to be defined. <br /> ♦ Evaluation of the individual monitoring well constituent trend analysis in the draft report was <br /> incomplete. A discussion of the effectiveness of e xt on area versus outside the capture zone <br /> undwater extraction and reinjection m <br /> should be included. Concentration trends near <br /> should be compared. <br /> ♦ An estimate based on soils data of additional inputs of contaminants from the soil coll�umnt <br /> groundwater. <br /> working at this site and an estimate of when the <br /> ♦ Discussion of the natural attenuation mechanisms objectives. <br /> groundwater will meet background or estabiisined water quality ] <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> 00d Rccytted Paper <br />