Laserfiche WebLink
Jun 09 2003 9: 02AM H' '_RSERJET 3330 p. 1 <br /> California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> QW; Central Valley Region <br /> Robert Schneider,Chair (a <br /> Winston H.likkoz Gray Davis <br /> S---t-f-r Sacra nento Main OMce Govenwr <br /> 6nWronmenW Internet Address; http;/Awww.swrcb.ca.gov1-iwgcb5 <br /> Protection 3443 Routier Road,Suite A,Sacramento,California 95827-3003 <br /> Phone(916)255-3000•FAX(916)255-3164 <br /> 22 May 2003 <br /> Ms. Linda M. Gonsalves <br /> Pacific Gas and Electric Company <br /> California Gas Transmission <br /> 375 North Wiget Lane, Suite 200 <br /> Walnut Creek, California 94598-2412 <br /> REMEDIAL ACTION DOCUMENT,PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, <br /> LATHROP DEHYDRATOR STATION, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> We have reviewed the 6 May 2003 Remedial Action Document(Work Plan) and the <br /> 30 April 2003 Q14 Groundwater Monitoring Report(GMR), submitted by CI-12M Hill on behalf <br /> of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company(PG&E) for the Lathrop Dehydrator Station. The <br /> Lathrop Dehydrator Station is at the northwest comer of the intersection of Undine and Willow <br /> Glenn Roads about 6 miles northeast of Tracy in San Joaquin County. The GMR contains the <br /> groundwater monitoring results for samples collected in January 2003 and reports that <br /> monitoring well MW-1,which contained the highest pollutant concentrations in the past, <br /> contained 35 µg/1 of benzene, 13,000 µg/1 of total petroleum hydrocarbons in the gasoline range <br /> (TPHg), and 23,000 µg/1 of total petroleum hydrocarbons in the diesel range(TPHd). Five of 12 <br /> monitoring wells did not contain detectable concentrations of the pollutants. <br /> In the Work Plan,PG&E proposes a soil cleanup strategy. PG&E proposes to remove the <br /> inactive production equipment and foundation pads, and excavate around the former reboiler, <br /> extending the excavation offsite. PG&E proposes to properly abandon monitoring wells MW-1, <br /> MW-9 and MW-10 before conducting the excavation work. PG&E also proposes to collect soil <br /> confirmation samples from the excavation pit and to use soil cleanup standards of 100 mg/kg for <br /> TPHd and 10 mg/kg for TPHg. PG&E contends that soil that meets the TPHg and TPHd cleanup <br /> objectives will not contain detectable concentrations of benzene, toluene,ethylbenzene and <br /> xylene. The remaining groundwater monitoring wells will continue to be sampled in accordance <br /> with Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 5-01-877 and, if necessary, a groundwater cleanup <br /> strategy will developed after four quarters of sampling. The Work Plan is acceptable, and PG&E <br /> should proceed with its implementation. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> 0 Recycted Paper <br /> The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take inwrtediate action to reduce energy eonaumption. For a list of <br /> .+rm-J, -*vn„ran rrAire dem*nd■nd cut voir ener¢v costs.tee our Web-site at htto://www.swrcb.ca Kov/rwgeb5 <br />