Laserfiche WebLink
Table 5 <br /> Historical Groundwater Analytical Data <br /> South Shore Parcels-Parcel 2A and Adjacent Areas <br /> West Weber Avenue and North Lincoln Street <br /> Stockton,California <br /> Depth Ethyl- <br /> Sample (feet, Date TPHg TPHd TPHo Benzene Toluene benzene Xylenes MTBE TBA As <br /> ID bgs) Sampled (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) <br /> Explanations(cont.): <br /> 7=Sample exhibits unknown single peak or peaks. <br /> "=QA/QC samples collected by Clayton Group Services for Unocal:Lincoln/Weber. <br /> 9=The method reporting limit for TPHd is increased due to interference from gasoline-range hydrocarbons. <br /> '0=Repeated analysis yielded inconsistent results. The highest recovery value of has been reported,but should be considered an estimate. <br /> "=Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Results were affected by the analyte concentration already present in the un-spiked sample. <br /> "=Samples collected by Clayton Group Services for Unocal:Lincoln/Weber. <br /> '3=The silica gel extract for TPHd contained a slight contamination from the material in the extract vial cap. These compounds were subtracted from the TPH value. <br /> '4=Surrogate recovery for Method 8015 is above/outside the control limit(s). This may indicate a bias in the analysis due to the sample's matrix or an interference <br /> with the surrogate from compounds present in the sample. <br /> "=The original silica-gel-treated extract for sample MW-11 yielded results that did not appear consistent with the non-silica-gel-treated extract. The sample was re-prepared and re- <br /> analyzed. The second analysis was more consistent,and is the one that has been reported. It was extracted out of hold time,however. <br /> 6=Hydrocarbons reported as TPH as Motor Oil do not exhibit a typical Motor Oil chromatographic pattern. These hydrocarbons are higher boiling than typical diesel fuel,and/or have <br /> discrete peaks which may or may not be petroleum related. <br /> "=The sample was analyzed by EPA Method 82608 using a bottle that contained a headspace bubble greater than 1/4-inch in diameter. All of the HCI-preserved bottles for this sample <br /> contained headspace bubbles. This can happen with alkaline samples,because the Bicarbonate reacts with HCI to form Carbon Dioxide. <br /> 18=Hydrocarbons reported as TPH as Diesel do not exhibit a typical Diesel chromatographic pattern. These hydrocarbons are higher boiling than typical diesel fuel,and/or have discrete <br /> peaks which may or may not be petroleum related. <br /> 9=Surrogate recovery for Method 8015 was above the control limit(s). Since there were no Diesel or Motor-Oil range hydrocarbons detected in the sample,no data are flagged. <br /> 20=Samples were analyzed by EPA Method 82608 using a bottle that contained a headspace bubble greater than 1/4-inch in diameter. <br /> 21=Sample was re-analyzed to confirm the presence of compounds that were detected in the first analysis. <br /> 22=The Method Blank associated with sample MWA 8 contained 81 ug/L TPH as Motor Oil. <br /> 23=Samples collected by Wallace Kuhl for Unocal:Lincoln/Weber. <br /> 24=Hydrocarbons reported as TPH as motor oil do not exhibit a typical motor oil chromatographic pattern. <br /> 25=The Method Blank associated with samples MW-39 contained 88 ug/L TPH as Motor Oil. <br /> 26=Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Results for the analyte Toluene were affected by the analyte concentration already present in the un-spiked sample. <br /> 27=Hydrocarbons reported as TPH as Diesel do not exhibit a typical Diesel chromatographic pattern. There are discrete peaks which may or may not be petroleum related. <br /> 28=Hydrocarbons reported as TPH as Motor Oil do not exhibit a typical Motor Oil chromatographic pattern. These hydrocarbons are lower boiling than typical motor oil. <br /> 29=Hydrocarbons reported as TPH as Gasoline do not exhibit a typical Gasoline chromatographic pattern.These spikes are most likely due to the presence of tetrahydrafuran in the sample. <br /> 30=Results reported for P,M-Xylene that are below the method reporting limit should be considered estimates. The method detection limit for this compound is 0.37 ug/L. <br /> 3'=Hydrocarbons reported as TPH motor oil do not exhibit a typical Motor Oil chromatographic pattern. There are discrete peaks which may or may not be petroleum related. <br /> 32=Hydrocarbons reported as TPH as Motor Oil do not exhibit a typical Motor Oil chromatographic pattern.These hydrocarbons are lower boiling than typical motor oil. <br /> 33=TPHo results may be bias+/-47.0 ug/L. <br /> 34=Results reported for P,M-Xylene that are below the method reporting limit should be considered estimates. The method detection limit for this compound is 0.09 ug/L. <br /> 35=Hydrocarbons reported as TPH Diesel do not exhibit a typical diesel chromatographic pattern. These hydrocarbons are lower boiling than typical diesel fuel. <br /> 36=Discrete peaks present in motor oil range,atypical for motor oil. <br /> 37=Hydrocarbons are lower boiling than typical motor oil. <br /> 38=Analysis by Modified Method EPA 8015 yielded inconsistent results. The concentrations appear to vary between the bottles. The highest valid results are reported. <br /> 39=Surrogate Recovery for test method Mod.EPA 8015 was outside of control limits. This may indicate a bias in the analysis due to the sample's matrix or an interference from compounds <br /> present in the sample. <br /> 41=Gasoline hydrocarbons appeared to be present in much higher concentrations when measured via EPA Method 8015 as compared to EPA 82608. If there is undissolved product <br /> present in the bottle it will likely be included in the 8015 value but not the 8260B value. It is probable that the sample contains un-dissolved product. <br /> 41=Discrete peaks in Diesel range,atypical for Diesel fuel. <br /> 42=Discrete peaks,lower boiling hydrocarbons present,atypical for motor oil. <br /> 43=Lower boiling hydrocarbons present,atypical for diesel fuel. <br /> 44=Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate results were outside of control limits. This may indicate a bias for the sample that was spiked. Since the LCS recoveries were within control limits, <br /> no data are flagged. <br /> 45=City of Stockton well;well not sampled this quarter. <br /> 46=Primarily compounds not found in typical gasoline. <br /> 4'=Discrete peaks,higher boiling hydrocarbons present,atypical for diesel fuel. <br /> 48=Method reporting limit increased due to interference from gasoline-range hydrocarbons. <br /> 41=Hydrocarbons reported as TPH as Diesel do not exhibit a typical Diesel chromatographic pattern. These hydrocarbons are higher boiling than typical diesel fuel. <br /> 60=Hydrocarbons reported as TPH Gasoline do not exhibit a typical Gasoline chromatographic pattern. The TPH Gasoline values are attributed to the presence of 2-ethyl-l-Hexanol <br /> which Kiff Analytical does not consider to be a typical gasoline constituent. <br /> Page 66 of 67 <br />