Laserfiche WebLink
from water purchases, with only 16 percent coming from its own groundwater wells. <br /> Annual groundwater usage in the Cal Water Stockton District from 2016 to 2020 has <br /> varied from 924 acre-feet to 4,681 acre-feet(Cal Water 2021). <br /> The Cal Water 2020 Urban Water Management Plan analyzed the availability of water <br /> supply for the Stockton District, based on historical surface water and groundwater use <br /> and review of available information regarding future supply availability, including the <br /> impacts of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. To develop its demand <br /> projections, Cal Water used the Stockton General Plan 2040 land use map, which <br /> designates the project site for low-density residential use. Based on the available <br /> information, the available groundwater supply and the purchased water supply are <br /> expected to be sufficient to meet the projected future demands of Cal Water's service <br /> area in normal and multiple dry year periods through 2045 (Cal Water 2021). No <br /> additional supplies would be required. As the project is consistent with the land use <br /> assumption used in preparation of the Cal Water 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, its <br /> impact on groundwater supply is considered less than significant. <br /> The project site currently consists of vacant land. Project development, with its additional <br /> impervious surfaces, would eliminate most of the vacant land, which serves as a recharge <br /> area for local aquifers. However, the project would be required to comply with the <br /> provisions of the SWQCCP that include the implementation of Volume Reduction <br /> Measures and Low Impact Development Treatment Controls, such as vegetated buffer <br /> strips, infiltration basins, porous pavement, and grassy swales, among others. A <br /> registered professional engineer shall design the site to comply with the volume reduction <br /> requirement outlined in the County's 2021 SWQCCP. Implementation of measures like <br /> these would allow for greater percolation and maintenance of recharge of local aquifers. <br /> Project impacts on groundwater supplies and recharge would be less than significant. <br /> c-i, ii) Drainage Patterns. <br /> Drainage patterns on the project site are limited, as most precipitation on the site <br /> percolates into the ground, with some runoff entering Duck Creek and Bieghle Drain. As <br /> noted in b) above, project development would involve additional impervious surfaces, <br /> which would alter existing drainage patterns. However, as described in Chapter 2.0, <br /> Project Description, drainage on the project site would be collected and disposed of in <br /> accordance with the MS4 permit and/or County standards, depending on the alternative <br /> selected. This would ensure that drainage after project completion would not result in <br /> siltation or flooding, either onsite or offsite. Project impacts on drainage patterns would <br /> be less than significant. <br /> c-iii) Runoff. <br /> The project would result in increased runoff being generated on the project site, as <br /> impervious surfaces would be added. However, as noted in a) above, runoff would be <br /> collected by storm drainage facilities. In accordance with San Joaquin County Code <br /> Chapter 9-1135, where a development project will cause an increase in the storm water <br /> runoff release rate, the developer shall provide drainage facilities to prevent the increased <br /> runoff release rate of storm water from discharging onto other properties. As a condition <br /> Pock Lane Public Review Draft IS/MND 3-47 May 2022 <br />