Laserfiche WebLink
Xx July 1999 <br />AGE -NC Project No. 99-0557 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />Petroleum hydrocarbon compounds were detected in 1 of the 19 soil samples analyzed <br />(Table 1). The reported detections of petroleum hydrocarbon compounds were in a soil <br />sample collected from soil probe boring P-6 located adjacent to a hydraulic lift within the <br />dealership service department. TPH-g, TPH-d, and TPH-mo were detected in the soil sample <br />collected at 10.5 feet bsg at concentrations of 1.4 mg/kg, 13,000 mg/kg, and 16,000 mg/kg, <br />respectively. Laboratory analytical results indicate that a release of petroleum hydrocarbons <br />has apparently occurred from the hydraulic lift located adjacent to probe P-6. There were <br />reported detections of BTEX, TPH-g, TPH-d, TPH-mo TBE r PCBs In any of the soil w, <br />samples collected from the additional hydraulic lift locations, former gasoline and waste oil <br />UST locations, or areas of surficial staining. Based on the laboratory analytical results, no Q } <br />releases of petroleum hydrocarbons were detected from the additional hydraulic lift's <br />locations, former gasoline and waste oil UST locations, or areas of surficial staining. <br />Concentrations of TPH-d and TPH-mo were detected in one of the three ground water <br />samples analyzed (Table 2). TPH-d and TPH-mo were detected in the ground water sample <br />collected from probe boring P-6 at 2,300 /..tg/l and 3,300 E.ig/1, respectively. Analytical results <br />indicate that a release of petroleum hydrocarbon compounds has apparently occurred from <br />the hydraulic lift located adjacent to probe P-6 and has impacted ground water. The reported <br />concentration of TPH-d exceeded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -suggested <br />Drinking Water Health Advisory or Suggested No -Adverse -Response Level (SNARL) for <br />toxicity other than cancer risk of 100 ,ug/l. There is no State or Federal EPA -suggested or <br />-established contaminant level for TPH-mo in ground water. Based on the laboratory <br />analytical results, no releases of petroleum hydrocarbons were detected at the other hydraulic <br />lift locations or the former location of the gasoline UST. <br />7.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Based upon data reviewed and collected at the site, AGE recommends: <br />Removal of hydraulic fluid and/or miscellaneous fluid (i.e., brake fluid, motor oil, water, <br />etc.) that may have collected in the sumps of the twin -post hydraulic lifts (adjacent to probe <br />locations P-1, P-5, P-6, P-7, and P-9) to prevent any additional and/or potential release of <br />petroleum hydrocarbons. <br />Additional site assessment activities to evaluate the lateral extent of petroleum hydrocarbon <br />impact to soil and ground water related to the hydraulic lift located adjacent to probe boring <br />P-6. It is recommended that additional site assessment consist of the advancement of up to <br />three soil probe borings in the area surrounding the hydraulic lift for the collection and <br />analysis of soil and ground water samples. <br />Based on the analytical results, there appears to be no petroleum hydrocarbon impacts related <br />Advanced GcoEnvironmental, Inc. <br />