My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINCOLN
>
56
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0526394
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2021 11:39:23 AM
Creation date
5/27/2021 10:35:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0526394
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0017859
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
STREET_NUMBER
56
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
LINCOLN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13737003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
56 S LINCOLN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L & M OPERABLE UNIT- FIRST QUARTER 2012 SITE STATUS, REMEDIAL SUMMARY, <br />AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT <br />Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling <br />April 30, 2012 <br />I:\Tidewater\TW Stockton (P2A)\QMRs\2012\1Q12\1Q12 QSSR QRSR QMR Stockton_FINAL.doc 2.6 <br />2.3.2.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Samples <br />TPHd, TPHo, TPHg, BTEX compounds, fuel oxygenates (MtBE, TAME, DIPE, EtBE, TBA), and <br />VOCs were not detected at or above laboratory MRLs within Stantec’s equipment blanks <br />QCEB-1-RG, QCEB-1-PV, QCEB-2-RG, QCEB-2-PV, and QCEB-3-RG, with the exception of a <br />toluene detection slightly above the MRL in QCEB-2-RG (0.00056 mg/L). <br />Duplicate samples QCDUP-1, QCDUP-3, and QCDUP-7 were collected from L&M OU shallow <br />zone wells MW-34, MW-21, and MW-25, respectively, during 1Q12 sampling event. A <br />comparison of the samples is shown below. <br />Analyte Sample # <br />MW-34 <br />Sample # <br />QCDUP-1 % Difference <br />TPHg (mg/L)<0.05 <0.05 0% <br />TPHd (mg/L)0.057 <0.05 ~13.1% <br />TPHo (mg/L)<0.05 <0.05 0% <br />Benzene (mg/L)<0.0005 <0.0005 0% <br />MtBE (mg/L)<0.0005 <0.0005 0% <br />TBA (mg/L)<0.005 <0.005 0% <br />Analyte Sample # <br />MW-21 <br />Sample # <br />QCDUP-3 % Difference <br />TPHg (mg/L)<0.05 <0.05 0% <br />TPHd (mg/L)0.77 0.80 +/-3.8% <br />TPHo (mg/L)<0.05 <0.05 0% <br />Benzene (mg/L)<0.0005 <0.0005 0% <br />MtBE (mg/L)<0.0005 <0.0005 0% <br />TBA (mg/L)<0.005 <0.005 0% <br />Analyte Sample # <br />MW-25 <br />Sample # <br />QCDUP-7 % Difference <br />TPHg (mg/L)<0.05 <0.05 0% <br />TPHd (mg/L)<0.05 <0.05 0% <br />TPHo (mg/L)<0.05 <0.05 0% <br />Benzene (mg/L)<0.0005 <0.0005 0% <br />MtBE (mg/L)<0.0005 <0.0005 0% <br />TBA (mg/L)<0.005 <0.005 0% <br />A percent difference for TPHd results associated with sample MW-34 and QCDUP-1 is <br />estimated at about 13.1 percent (based on MDL of 0.05 mg/L) during 1Q12 due to QCDUP-1 <br />being below the MDL.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.