My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014047
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BETHANY
>
0
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
LAFC 24-20
>
SU0014047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2021 1:53:35 PM
Creation date
6/7/2021 1:50:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014047
PE
2688
FACILITY_NAME
LAFC 24-20
STREET_NUMBER
0
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
BETHANY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
Zip
95304-
APN
20916009
ENTERED_DATE
4/2/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
0 W BETHANY RD
RECEIVED_DATE
4/1/2021 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Less Than Potentially Less Than Analyzed Significant <br />Significantwith Mitigation Significant No In The <br />Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Prior EIR <br />VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Directly or indirectly cause potential <br />substantial adverse effects, including the risk <br />of loss, injury, or death involving: <br />Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as <br />delineated on the most recent Alquist- <br />Friolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map <br />issued:by/he State Geologist for the area <br />or based on other substantial evidence of <br />a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines <br />and Geology Special Publication 42. <br />Strong seismic ground shaking? <br />Seismic-related ground failure, including <br />liquefaction? <br />Landslides? <br />b) Result in substantial soil erosion or-the loss of <br />topsoil? <br />c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is <br />unstable, or that would become unstable as a <br />result of the project, and potentially result in <br />on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, <br />subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? <br />d) Be located on expansive soil and create direct <br />or indirect risks to life or property? <br />Have soils incapable -of adequately-supporting <br />the use of septic tanks or alternative waste <br />water disposal systems where sewers are not <br />available for the disposal of waste water? <br />Directly or indirectly destroy a unique <br />paleontological resource or site or unique <br />geologic feature? <br />Impact Discussion: <br />a-f) The geology of San Joaquin County is composed of high organic alluvium, which is susceptible to <br />earthquake movement. The project will have to comply with the California Building Code (CBC) which <br />includes provisions for soils reports for grading and foundations as well as design criteria for seismic <br />loading and other geologic hazards based on fault and seismic hazard mapping. All recommendations <br />from a soils report must be incorporated into the construction plans. Therefore, impacts to seismic- <br />related (or other) landslide hazards will be less than significant. <br />The proposed development project will not affect geology and soils, since it will not change <br />geotechnical standards or development patterns. The project site is relatively flat terrain and a soils <br />report will be required for grading and foundations and all recommendations from a soils report must <br />be incorporated into the construction plans. <br />PA-2000063(MP), PA-2000064(SP), & PA-2000065(SA1— Initial Study 13 <br />xi <br />1 1 <br />UI <br />ix
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.