Laserfiche WebLink
Potentially Less Than Less Than Analyzed Significant <br />Significant with-Mitigation Significant No In The <br />Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Prior EIR <br />XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF <br />SIGNIFICANCE. <br />Does the project have the potential to <br />substantially degrade the quality of the <br />environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a <br />fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife <br />population to drop below self-sustaining levels, <br />threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, <br />substantially reduce the number or restrict the <br />range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or <br />eliminate important examples of the major periods <br />of California history or prehistory? <br />Does the project have impacts that are <br />individually limited, but cumulatively <br />considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" <br />means that the incremental effects of a project are <br />considerable when viewed in connection with the <br />effects of past projects, the effects of other current <br />projects, and the effects of probable future <br />projects)? <br /> <br />Ix <br />Does the project have environmental effects <br />which will cause substantial adverse _effects on <br />human beings, either directly or indirectly? 1 LI <br /> <br />Impact Discussion: <br />a-c) <br /> The proposed application does not have the potential to degrade the environment or eliminate a plant <br />or animal community. The project would not result in significant cumulative impacts or cause <br />substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. <br />Note: Authority cited: Sections 21083, 21083.05, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 65088.4, Gov. <br />Code; Sections 21080, 21083.05, 21095, Pub. Resources Code; Eureka Citizens for Responsible Govt. v. City <br />of Eureka (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 357; Protect the Historic Amador Waterways v. Amador Water Agency <br />(2004) 116 Cal.App.4th at 1109; San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City and County of San <br />Francisco (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 656. <br />PA-2000063(MP), PA-2000064(SP), & PA-2000065(SA) — Initial Study 30