My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
8010
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542459
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2021 10:48:47 AM
Creation date
6/11/2021 10:12:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0542459
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0024400
FACILITY_NAME
CAARNG STOCKTON FMS #24
STREET_NUMBER
8010
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17726004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
8010 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 SUMMARY OF RESULTS <br />A geophysical survey was conducted at a former waste disposal area at the California Army <br />National Guard facility in Stockton, California in May 2006. The purpose of this investigation <br />was to map, if possible, vertical extents of the waste pit area. Geophysical methods used durinc2.- <br />this investigation included the 2-D electrical resistivity imaging, multi-channel analysis of <br />surface waves, and seismic refraction methods. Fizure 1 illustrates the location of the <br />geophysical arrays. <br />2-D electrical resistivity imaging, along with shallow seismic techniques, were employed as non- <br />invasive means of determining the depth extent of the fill material within the bounds of the drum <br />disposal area. Electrical resistivity models (Figures 2-3) indicate the presence of a relatively <br />conductive unconsolidated fill material overlaying more resistive consolidated soils. Seismic <br />refraction and surface wave data (Figures 4 to 7) were modeled as having a low-velocity <br />unconsolidated soils unit overlaying a higher-velocity, more consolidated soils unit. Depth <br />estimates from the electrical resistivity survey were consistent with seismic surface waves and <br />refraction models within 10%. On average, thickness of the fill material is modeled as being 10- <br />14 ft thick in the central portion of the pit area, with thickness decreasing slightly at the edges. <br />6243 Versax 10 July 6, 2006
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.