Laserfiche WebLink
Monitoring Report Compliance Checklist <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> RWQCB <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A Reviewer Comment <br /> Standard c. Lab Reports: Are all sample analyses X <br /> Provisions conducted by a laboratory accredited <br /> (Sept 93/Aug 97) by the State Department of Health <br /> Services? <br /> d. Wastes: Is there a description of the X <br /> quantities and types of wastes <br /> discharged and the locations in the <br /> WMU there waste has been placed since <br /> submittal of the last monitoring report? <br /> WDRs/MRP/ Surface Water Monitoring <br /> Standard <br /> Provisions e. Are all surface water Field Parameters, X Sampled on 24 January, <br /> (Sept 93/Aug 97) Monitoring Parameters, and COCs included 5-yr COCs. <br /> (if required) sampled and analyzed? <br /> f. Have any surface water concentration X CL was not exceeded,however <br /> limits been exceeded? If yes,identify pH at downstream location <br /> in comments. was higher than upstream. The <br /> field notes indicate that a <br /> puddle was sampled though. <br /> g. Run-off/Run-On: Is there an evaluation X <br /> of the effectiveness of run-off/run-on <br /> control facilities? <br /> WDRs/MRP/ Leachate Monitoring <br /> Standard <br /> Provisions h. Are all leachate Field.Parameters, <br /> (Sept 93/Aug 97) Monitoring Parameters, and COCs X <br /> (if required) sampled and analyzed? <br /> i. Is there an evaluation of the X <br /> effectiveness of leachate monitoring <br /> and control facilities? <br /> WDRs/MRP Vadose Zone Monitoring <br /> j. Are all vadose zone Field Parameters, X Lysimeters 2, 3,and 4 were <br /> Monitoring Parameters, and COCs sampled on 2 March 2000,but <br /> (if required) sampled and analyzed? only got about 10 ml from each. <br /> Tested for pH and EC only. <br /> k. Have any vadose zone concentration X <br /> limits been exceeded? If yes, identify <br /> in comments. <br />