My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0083841_OWTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TRETHEWAY
>
17251
>
4200 – Liquid Waste Program
>
SR0083841_OWTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2021 11:25:02 AM
Creation date
7/6/2021 11:23:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4200 – Liquid Waste Program
FileName_PostFix
OWTS
RECORD_ID
SR0083841
PE
4201
STREET_NUMBER
17251
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
TRETHEWAY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LOCKEFORD
Zip
95237
APN
05115014
ENTERED_DATE
6/11/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17251 N TRETHEWAY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-INTRODUCTION <br />Chesney Consulting has been retained by Mr. Harold Lepelley, owner of the County Manor <br />Mobile Home Park (CMMHP) in Lockeford, CA to conduct an investigation of the Onsite <br />Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) that is currently operating at the CMMHP facility. <br />The purpose of this investigation was to determine the functionality of the existing Nottingham <br />Wastewater Treatment System by comparing raw sewage influent constituents with the effluent <br />constituents after treatment by the Nottingham system. System diagrams, and disposal area <br />schematics are found in Appendix B. This System was installed in 1971 and is approaching the <br />end of its lifespan. It is becoming uneconomical with continual maintenance and repair issues <br />and its treatment efficiency is questionable. Consequently, Mr. Lepelley and Mr. Jim Genn - <br />who assists Mr. Lepelley with the operation and maintenance of the system, have decided to <br />investigate the possibility of updating the OWTS. <br />Mr. Lepelley and Mr. Genn are interested replacing the Nottingham System with a conventional <br />system consisting of low, well-defined maintenance, but were unsure of the viability of such a <br />system and whether it will comply with San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br />(EHD) requirements. Subsequently, the EHD administration was contacted to inform them of <br />this Phase I project, what is to be accomplished, and to ensure compliance with EHD rules and <br />regulations after their review of this document. Phase II of this project will be the design and <br />installation of a new OWTS, provided approval of this document is obtained from EHD. <br />In addition to investigating the wastewater treatment system, the effluent receiving soils were <br />sampled and tested for the ability to further treat the effluent and determine if the soils can <br />mitigate adverse effluent constituents, particularly nitrate-nitrogen. Soil test results indicate <br />mitigation of nitrate-nitrogen, ammonium-nitrogen, and organic-nitrogen concentrations. <br />MATERIALS AND METHODS <br />The investigation began with reviewing the construction diagrams of the Nottingham Treatment <br />System. Sampling began by using a telescoping pole and sampling at mid-depth of the raw <br />wastewater influent, 2,000 gallon septic tank. This tank can be considered the headworks trash <br />tank by receiving wastewater inflows from all 40 mobile home units. Daily flow volumes were <br />not quantified for this document. After the sampling of the raw influent, treated effluent was <br />then sampled from the "final tank" of the Nottingham system, also from the mid-depth point of <br />this final tank. <br />All sample containers, with proper preservative (if required) were provided by Precision Enviro- <br />Tech of Stockton, CA. After sampling, the samples were transported to Precision Enviro-Tech in <br />a cooled ice chest, under the attached Chain of Custody. Test Results for each constituent tested <br />is illustrated in Table I below, and are denoted as OWTS Influent and OWTS Effluent. These <br />test results were also compared with data obtained from Small and Decentralized Wastewater <br />Management Systems by Crites and Tchobanoglous (Ref. 2), Table 4-16: <br />Page -1- <br />Chesney Consulting
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.