Laserfiche WebLink
UNIFIED PROGRAM VIOLATION CLASSIFICATIONS AND FACTORS <br /> The other unified program elements do not have a three-tiered system of violation classification <br /> equivalent to the Hazardous Wastes Program. However, this guidance recommends a similar <br /> three-tiered system approach across all unified program elements for consistent, uniformity, <br /> standard classification to assist in determining an appropriate enforcement response. See <br /> Attachment A for examples of violations classification on each unified program element. In <br /> addition to the three-tiered approach in classifying violations,below are some common factors and <br /> terms to consider when enforcing the unified program elements. <br /> Chronic and Recalcitrant Violator <br /> Chronic is defined as continuing or occurring again and again; a habit or pattern of behavior or <br /> frequent recurrence. For the purpose of applying this definition to violation classification, <br /> violations of the same statutory or regulatory requirement identified on more than one occasion at <br /> the same facility may be considered a chronic violation. The UPA should consider whether there <br /> is evidence indicating that the violator has engaged in a pattern of neglect or disregard with respect <br /> to the statutory or regulatory requirements. A recalcitrant violator is a person that is cited for <br /> chronic violations, actively refuses to comply with the regulatory requirements, or has engaged in <br /> a pattern of neglect or disregard for statutory or regulatory requirements. <br /> Economic Benefit <br /> Economic benefit focuses on the violator's economic gain from noncompliance, i.e., the extent to <br /> which the violator benefits financially as a direct result of noncompliance. In general, a violator <br /> can gain an economic benefit in three basic ways: <br /> (1) Delaying necessary compliance expenditures; <br /> (2)Avoiding necessary compliance expenditures; and/or <br /> (3)Having an unfair economic advantage over other businesses of similar industry. <br /> NOTE: The clarification of the term "economic benefit"as provided above refers only to the phrase as it is used in <br /> the definition of a minor violation[reference HSC, section 25404(a)(3)j. For purposes of defining and determining <br /> economic benefit in the calculation of penalties during enforcement, please refer to the Model Inspection and <br /> Enforcement Program Plan, the State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Enforcement Policy or U.S. <br /> EPA's Penalty and Financial Models for calculating economic benefi or the Civil Penalty Policy of the Clean Water <br /> Act. <br /> Violation Classification Guidance for UPAS Page 7 <br />