not have time to leave a full inspection report, so a checklist was left with Mr.
<br /> Khajevandi. A completed inspection report was faxed to the facility on July 30, 2010
<br /> (Attachment 35), and photos taken during the inspection were sent by mail on August 4,
<br /> 2010 (Attachment 36).
<br /> On July 29, 2010, a permit application, SR0060637, was submitted for the 91-octane fill
<br /> sump sensor that was replaced during the previous day's inspection, and repair of the
<br /> wiring for the 87-octane south UST annular sensor. Mr. Cacapit approved the permit on
<br /> August 4, 2010 (Attachment 37).
<br /> On August 30, 2010, a return to compliance certification and disposal records for the
<br /> waste found on site during the July 26, 2010, hazardous waste inspection were
<br /> submitted (Attachment 38). A corrective actions statement was not submitted.
<br /> On September 1, 2010, Mr. Cacapit sent a fax to Mr. Khajevandi asking for a corrective
<br /> actions statement for the violations on the July 26, 2010, hazardous waste inspection
<br /> report (Attachment 39).
<br /> On September 7, 2010, Mr. Cacapit sent a fax to Mr. Khajevandi asking for a corrective
<br /> actions statement for the violations on the July 26, 2010, hazardous waste inspection
<br /> report (Attachment 40).
<br /> On September 14, 2010, a return to compliance certification, corrective actions
<br /> statement, a September 8, 2010, work order for repairs to the leaking dispensers, and
<br /> an updated designated operator employee training record were submitted (Attachment
<br /> 41).
<br /> On September 23, 2010, an amendment to permit application SR0060637 was
<br /> submitted to replace the shear valve at dispenser 5/6. Mr. Cacapit approved the
<br /> amendment the following day (Attachment 42).
<br /> On October 13, 2010, Mr. Cacapit witnessed the successful testing of the 87-octane
<br /> annular sensor (Attachment 43). The 91-octane annular sensor was replaced and
<br /> tested successfully while on site, and the permit application would have to be amended
<br /> to include this. Mr. Khajevandi submitted a recordable release statement to Mr. Cacapit
<br /> for the diesel leaks for during the July 28, 2010, UST inspection (Attachment 44).
<br /> On December 7, 2010, an amendment to permit application SR0060637 was submitted
<br /> for the 91-octane UST annular sensor replaced on October 13, 2010 (Attachment 45).
<br /> Mr. Cacapit approved the amendment that day.
<br /> On April 22, 2011, a monitoring system certification test report for the testing performed
<br /> on July 28, 2010, was submitted, eight months late (Attachment 46).
<br /> On July 26, 2011, Ms. Michelle Henry, Senior REHS, EHD, performed a routine UST
<br /> inspection (Attachment 47) and witnessed the monitoring system certification, leak
<br /> detector testing, and spill container testing. The diesel leak detector failed when tested,
<br /> and liquid was found in the vent sump.
<br /> On August 3, 2011, a permit application, SR0063168, was submitted to replace the
<br /> diesel leak detector. Mr. Cacapit approved the permit the following day (Attachment 48).
<br /> 5
<br />
|