My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2021
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CLUFF
>
500
>
2800 - Aboveground Petroleum Storage Program
>
PR0516579
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2021 10:41:32 AM
Creation date
9/13/2021 10:35:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2800 - Aboveground Petroleum Storage Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2021
RECORD_ID
PR0516579
PE
2832
FACILITY_ID
FA0009875
FACILITY_NAME
FORD CONST CO INC
STREET_NUMBER
500
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CLUFF
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04934013
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
500 N CLUFF AVE
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\kblackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Health Department <br />Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act Inspection Report <br />Date: <br />September 08, 2021 <br /> Facility Address: <br /> 500 N CLUFF AVE, LODI <br /> Facility Name: <br /> FORD CONST CO INC <br />Qualified Facility - Tier I <br /> 403 □ V □ R □ COSTier I Plan failed to predict direction/rate of flow/total quantity of oil potentially dischargedCFR 112.6(a)(3)(i) <br /> 404 □ V □ R □ COSNo adequate 2CT for bulk containers, or mobile storage containers not located to prevent dischargeCFR 112.6(a)(3)(ii) <br /> 405 □ V □ R □ COSFailed to provide systems to prevent overfills or to routinely test them (Tier I facility)CFR 112.6(a)(3)(iii) <br /> 406 □ V □ R □ COSTier I Plan failed to adequately describe the overfill prevention methods for each containerCFR 112.6(a)(3)(iii) <br />Qualified Facility - Tier II <br /> 501 □ V □ R □ COSTier II Qualified Facility Plan not certified by the owner or a PE, as requiredCFR 112.6(a)(1), <br />112.6(b) <br /> 502 □ V □ R □ COSTier II Qualified Facility Plan technical amendment not certified by the owner or a PECFR 112.6(b)(2) <br /> 503 □ V □ R □ COSFailure to have a PE certify in writing alternative measures for a Tier II Qualified FacilityCFR 112.6(b)(3), <br />112.6(b)(4) <br /> 504 □ V □ R □ COSFailure of owner to assure that a PE makes all required attestations in a Tier II PlanCFR 112.6(b)(4)(i) <br />General Requirements for SPCC Plans <br /> 601 □ V □ R □ COSFailure of Plan to fulfill basic requirements including a cross-referencing sectionCFR 112.7 <br /> 602 □ V □ R □ COSFailed to state reasons and detail nonconformance if claiming equivalent environmental protectionCFR 112.7(a)(2) <br /> 603 □ V □ R □ COSPlan failed to adequately and accurately describe the physical layout of the facilityCFR 112.7(a)(3) <br /> 604 □ V □ R □ COSPlan failed to include oil type and storage capacity for each containerCFR 112.7(a)(3)(i) <br /> 605 □ V □ R □ COSPlan failed to include an adequate facility diagram, or no facility diagram was includedCFR 112.7(a)(3), <br />25270.4.5(a) <br /> 606 □ V □ R □ COSPlan failed to adequately discuss discharge prevention measures, including routine handling of oilCFR 112.7(a)(3)(ii) <br /> 607 □ V □ R □ COSPlan failed to adequately discuss facility drainage or drainage controlsCFR 112.7(a)(3)(iii) <br /> 608 □ V □ R □ COSPlan failed to include countermeasures for discharge discovery, response and cleanupCFR 112.7(a)(3)(iv) <br /> 609 □ V □ R □ COSPlan failed to address disposal methods for recovered materialsCFR 112.7(a)(3)(v) <br /> 610 □ V □ R □ COSPlan failed to adequately detail information and procedures for reporting a dischargeCFR 112.7(a)(3vi), <br />112.7(a4) <br /> 611 □ V □ R □ COSDischarge procedures are not adequately addressed if the facility has no response planCFR 112.7(a)(5) <br /> 612 □ V □ R □ COSPlan doesn't have discharge prediction, including direction, rate of flow, and quantity of oilCFR 112.7(b) <br /> 613 □ V □ R □ COSPlan failed to discuss general secondary containment, equipment, or structures to prevent dischargeCFR 112.7(c) <br /> 614 □ V □ R □ COSFailure to provide appropriate secondary containment, diversionary structures or equipmentCFR 112.7(c) <br /> 615 □ V □ R □ COSPE certified Plan failed to explain impracticability of containment/diversionary structuresCFR 112.7(d) <br /> 616 □ V □ R □ COSFailure to perform integrity and leak testing when claiming secondary containment impracticabilityCFR 112.7(d), <br />25270.4.5(a) <br /> 617 □ V □ R □ COSFailed to prepare oil spill contingency plan when claiming containment structure impracticabilityCFR 112.7(d)(1) <br /> 618 □ V □ R □ COSNo written commitment of manpower, equipment, and materials to control and remove oil dischargeCFR 112.7(d)(2) <br /> 619 □ V □ R □ COSFailure to keep written records of procedures, inspections, and tests for at least three yearsCFR 112.7(e), 112.8(c) <br />(6) <br /> 620 □ V □ R □ COSFailed to train personnel on all discharge prevention details listed in this sectionCFR 112.7(f)(1) <br /> 621 □ V □ R □ COSFailed to designate a person accountable for discharge preventionCFR 112.7(f)(2) <br /> 622 □ V □ R □ COSPlan failed to include an adequate description of employee training and annual briefingsCFR 112.7(f)(1), <br />112.7(f)(3) <br />FA0009875 PR0516579 SC001 09/08/2021 <br />EHD 28-01 Rev. 9/16/2020 Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act OIRPage 2 of 4 <br />1868 E. Hazelton Avenue | Stockton, California 95205 | T 209 468-3420 | F 209 464-0138 | www.sjgov.org/EHD
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.