My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014434
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COMSTOCK
>
14515
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2100201
>
SU0014434
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2024 3:45:25 PM
Creation date
9/30/2021 2:33:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014434
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2100201
STREET_NUMBER
14515
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
COMSTOCK
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236-
APN
09102036, -37
ENTERED_DATE
9/29/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
14515 E COMSTOCK RD
RECEIVED_DATE
9/28/2021 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION <br /> PA-2100201 <br /> VICTOR A.& DIANE LAGORIO ET AL./DILLON &MURPHY C/O MIKE TOY <br /> 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, any applicable Master Plan, Specific <br /> Plan, and Special Purpose Plan and any other applicable plan adopted by the County. <br /> • Minor Subdivision No. PA-2100201 is consistent with the General Plan because the AG-40 <br /> (General Agriculture, 40-acre minimum parcel size) zoning of the subject parcels permits <br /> the division proposed and the zoning is an implementing zone for the parcel's A/G (General <br /> Agriculture)land use designation.Further, no Master Plan,Specific Plan,or Special Purpose <br /> Plan are applicable to Minor Subdivision No. PA-2100201. <br /> 2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and any <br /> applicable Specific Plan or Special Purpose Plan. <br /> • The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan <br /> and any applicable Specific Plan or Special Purpose Plan because the design and <br /> improvements meet the minimum standards contained in the General Plan as reflected in <br /> the Tentative Map. <br /> 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. <br /> • No development is proposed with this subdivision. The site is physically suitable for the <br /> type of subdivision proposed because all requirements contained in the Development Title <br /> and all minimum County standards are met. <br /> 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. <br /> • The subdivision does not propose any development. The resulting parcels are physically <br /> suitable to meet density requirements for any future development. <br /> 5. Neither the design of the subdivision nor any proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial <br /> environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. <br /> The subdivision does not propose any development,therefore,the design of the subdivision <br /> is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably <br /> injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. <br /> 6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvement is not likely to cause significant public health <br /> problems. <br /> • The subdivision does not propose any development,therefore,the design of the subdivision <br /> is not likely to cause significant public health problems. <br /> 7. The design of the subdivision or the types of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired <br /> by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. <br /> • The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large <br /> for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision because, if it is <br /> found that alternate easements for access or for use are necessary, that these will be <br /> substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. <br /> PA-2100201 — Findings 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.