Laserfiche WebLink
Geotechnical Engineering and Geological Hazard Study <br />Lincoln Elementary School ;Modernization Project <br />Manteca, California <br />Page 8 <br />located within 10 kilometers of a potentially active fault, not Site Class F, and the value of spectral <br />acceleration at the one second wave length (SI) was less than 0.75, so a Site Specific Seismic Hazard <br />Analysis was not required. <br />6.1.1 Design Parameters for Seismic Shaking <br />We recommend the following values for structural design according to the 2013 CBC and USGS. These <br />values are based on PGA= 0.354; PGA, =0.405; S, = 0.970; St = 0.348; Fa = 1.112; and F,. = 1.704. <br />Adjusted Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Accelerations <br />SIMS 1.079 <br />SMI 0.593 <br />Design Spectral Acceleration <br />SDs 0.719 <br />SDI 0.395 <br />We recommend the using the following design values: <br />SDS 0.72 <br />SDI 0.40 <br />6.2 LIQUEFACTION, SEISMIC SETTLEMENT POTENTIAL <br />Liquefaction normally occurs when sites underlain by saturated, loose to medium dense, granular soils are <br />subjected to relatively high ground shaking. During an earthquake, ground shaking may cause certain <br />types of soil deposits to lose shear strength, resulting in ground settlement, oscillation, loss of bearing <br />capacity, landsliding, and the buoyant rise of buried structures. The majority of liquefaction hazards are <br />associated with sandy soils, silty soils of low plasticity, and some gravelly soils. Cohesive soils (clays) are <br />generally not considered to be susceptible to liquefaction. In general, liquefaction hazards are most severe <br />within the upper 50 feet of the surface, except where slope faces or deep foundations are present (CDMG <br />Special Publication 117, 1997). The potential for an earthquake with the intensity and duration <br />characteristics capable of promoting liquefaction is a possibility during the design life of the project. <br />The liquefaction potential of the site soils was evaluated using the method described by Idriss and <br />Boulanger (2008). A depth to groundwater of 10 feet was used based on the data from the local <br />groundwater conditions (Section 5.2). A peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.405g and earthquake <br />magnitude, Mw = 6.6 were used in the analysis of liquefaction potential and liquefaction -induced <br />settlement. These values are based on the findings of the USGS design maps application site class D, <br />USGS deaggregation, and CGS results. Settlement calculations were performed for soil strata with a <br />factor of safety of less than 1.3.The results of the analysis indicated that a potential for liquefaction is <br />present within some sand and silt layers, but most of these layers are confined within non -liquefiable <br />layers of cohesive soils (clays), firm silts, dense sands, or a mixture of such liquefaction -resistant <br />materials. Therefore the potential effects of liquefaction under these conditions are limited to minor <br />settlement due to volumetric compression of the liquefied materials. Liquefaction settlement calculations <br />were made using the methodology of Idriss and Boulanger (2008) and Liquefaction SPT Analysis <br />software. The settlement analysis indicated that up to 1 to 2 inches of seismic settlement is possible from <br />the surface to a depth of 50 feet, with most of the settlement in the upper 15 to 30 feet. <br />Liquefaction is not expected to be widespread since potentially liquefiable silt layers identified are <br />confined by strata high in fine content, relatively dense or stiff, or not susceptible to liquefaction. <br />Furthermore, ground surface settlements should be significantly less due to bridging effects within the <br />overlying compacted soil. Additionally, deeper and therefore older soils are less likely to liquefy because <br />ow <br />to <br />''E <br />4�. <br />CONDOR <br />