My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
750
>
1600 - Food Program
>
PR0161533
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2021 7:17:05 PM
Creation date
10/15/2021 3:39:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
1600 - Food Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0161533
PE
1632
FACILITY_ID
FA0001342
FACILITY_NAME
MUSD-LINCOLN SCHOOL
STREET_NUMBER
750
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22118001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
750 E YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\jcastaneda
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2850
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering and Geological Hazard Study <br />Lincoln Elementary School Modernization Project <br />Manteca, California <br />Page 1 <br />c^3pgseFPdiX C contains ulc results of t1Pe LUPiosi'Yity tests p lion Led, as well as a brief evaluation letter by <br />our laboratory subcontractor. The brief evaluation provides general recommendations regarding <br />protecting buried metals. The results indicate that the sulfate ion concentration is insufficient to cause <br />damage to reinforced concrete and coated steel. If warranted, a corrosion expert should be consulted to <br />develop specific recommendations. <br />12.0 PERCOLATION TESTING <br />Percolation testing was not performed for inclusion into this report. If percolation testing and rates are <br />required for design, then the tests will be performed at a later date and reported separately. <br />13.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES <br />The geotechnical recommendations and design criteria given in this report are sensitive to the location, <br />design details, and any special requirements of the new construction. Condor should review the <br />geotechnical elements of project grading, foundation plans and specifications prior to construction <br />bidding to check that the intent of our recommendations has been incorporated into these project <br />documents. If Condor does not review the geotechnical elements of the plans and specifications, the <br />reviewing geotechnical engineer should thoroughly review this report and concur with its conclusions and <br />recommendations or provide alternative recommendations. <br />Because surface conditions vary across the site, geotechnical recommendations used as a basis for <br />construction contracting are sensitive to the possible need for adjustment in the field. The adjustments are <br />dependent upon conditions revealed during construction that could previously only be assumed based <br />upon site exploration. Since the intent of the recommendations given in this report are best understood by <br />a Condor representative, we recommend that field observations and testing during earthwork and <br />construction be performed by Condor. If Condor does not provide the field observations and testing, the <br />geotechnical engineer of record should thoroughly review this report and concur with its conclusions and <br />recommendations or provide alternative recommendations. <br />The geotechnical engineer or qualified representative should be on-site to observe and advise during site <br />preparation, grading and earthwork, paving, and construction of foundations and slabs -on -grade. These <br />observations should be supplemented with periodic density and compaction testing of subgrade and <br />engineered fills to evaluate conformance with the recommendations contained in this report. It is <br />important that foundation excavations be checked after cleaning and immediately prior to concrete <br />placement to verify their suitability. <br />14.0 LIMITATIONS <br />The geotechnical conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are intended for planning, design, <br />and construction of the new Lincoln Elementary School as described in this report. These conclusions and <br />recommendations may be invalid if. <br />• the design assumptions change; <br />• the report is used for another site or project; <br />• the encountered soil or groundwater conditions are different than those anticipated in this report; <br />• the recommendations contained in this report are not followed; or <br />• any other change is implemented that materially alters the project. <br />This report was prepared in accordance with the generally accepted standards of geotechnical engineering <br />practice existing in San Joaquin County at the time it was written. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is <br />W <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.