My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
750
>
1600 - Food Program
>
PR0161533
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2021 7:17:05 PM
Creation date
10/15/2021 3:39:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
1600 - Food Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0161533
PE
1632
FACILITY_ID
FA0001342
FACILITY_NAME
MUSD-LINCOLN SCHOOL
STREET_NUMBER
750
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22118001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
750 E YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\jcastaneda
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2850
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E1643 - 11 <br />APPENDIX <br />(Nonmandatory Information) <br />XI. PRE -DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS <br />X1.1 Planning and Organization of Construction—To <br />avoid ambiguities, redundancies, conflicts, and omissions, plan <br />the organization and coordination of drawings and specifica- <br />tions so that graphic, dimensional, and descriptive information <br />on subgrade, granular base, vapor retarder, and protection <br />course, if any, appears in only one place. Since the relationship <br />of the subgrade (pad) elevation (usually shown on grading <br />plans) to the rest of the building finish floor elevations and <br />finished site grades is a function of the depth of the granular <br />base and protection course, these dimensions should be shown <br />in only one place. For graphic depictions and dimensions of the <br />granular base and the protection course, the architectural <br />drawings are preferred, but structural drawings are sometimes <br />used. Specifications for sub -base conditions should be in the <br />grading section. Specifications for base, vapor retarder, and <br />protection course should be in the section on concrete, but <br />there are advocates of a separate section in Division 7 for the <br />vapor retarder system. Examination and testing of surface <br />conditions should be in appropriate finish sections. <br />X1.2 Scheduling—Determine if slab drying will be on the <br />critical path for schedule occupancy. If so, plan measures to <br />reduce drying times, mitigate moisture, or select floor finish <br />materials not subject to damage by moisture. <br />X1.3 Geotechnical—Ensure that the geotechnical survey <br />includes comprehensive and reliable information on subsurface <br />water table levels and the hydrology of geological strata as well <br />as historical data on surface flooding and hydrology. The <br />survey should also include a list of compounds and concentra- <br />tion levels that are deleterious to plastic materials. The geo- <br />technical study should consider not only the past but also the <br />projected change from ongoing or anticipated development <br />patterns. Soils with comparably higher clay contents are <br />particularly troublesome because the relatively high capillary <br />action within the clay allows moisture to rise under the slab. <br />X1.4 Civil—Ensure that site topographic surveys and grad- <br />ing plans accurately and comprehensively establish surface <br />drainage characteristics for the site and surrounding areas. <br />X1.5 Landscape and Irrigation—Most traditional geotech- <br />nical studies do not take into account the post -construction <br />change in ground moisture conditions due to introduced <br />planting and irrigation which is a major problem. For example, <br />in California coastal areas, the average annual rainfall is about <br />18 in. (457 mm). Turf irrigation amounting to 1.3 in. (33 mm) <br />of water per week over the normal seven-month dry season will <br />increase this to nearly 60 in. (1524 min) with almost no runoff. <br />It is not enough to assume that irrigation will simply duplicate <br />natural conditions encountered during the wet season. The <br />landscape architect, geotechnical engineer, and civil engineer <br />should closely coordinate design recommendations to avoid <br />moisture problems introduced or exacerbated by landscape <br />planting and irrigation. Once a project is completed, effective <br />irrigation management is instrumental not only in water <br />conservation but also in avoiding potential building -related <br />moisture problems. <br />X 1.6 Water Vapor Penneance of Vapor Retarder—In order <br />to prevent moisture damage to the slab on grade, floor covering <br />systems and floor coating systems the water vapor permeance <br />of the vapor retarder material shall be such that accumulation <br />of moisture in the slab through the vapor retarder material does <br />not occur. The vapor pressures of the below grade environment <br />and the interior environment shall be calculated and analyzed. <br />For humidity sensitive interior environments, calculate the <br />effect of vapor diffusion through the vapor retarder, slab on <br />grade and, if applicable, the floor covering or coating on the <br />interior humidity levels. Select a vapor retarder material with a <br />water vapor permeance rating that will maintain interior <br />humidity levels within specified tolerances. The water vapor <br />permeance of flooring material or coating shall be obtained, if <br />available. Calculate the amount of moisture entering the slab <br />through the vapor retarder material. Calculate the amount of <br />moisture that can diffuse through the flooring material. Insure <br />that the water vapor permeance of the vapor retarder material <br />does not allow accumulation of moisture within the slab due to <br />water vapor permeance of the flooring material. Analyze soil <br />temperatures with regard to heat flux through the slab on grade <br />as well as interior temperature and RH levels. Determine if <br />conditions exist for a dew point within the slab. If such <br />conditions can potentially exist, analyze the amount of mois- <br />ture accumulation within the slab versus the drying potential of <br />the slab through its top surface, and if applicable, through the <br />floor covering system to determine if prolonged and detrimen- <br />tal wetting of the slab will occur. If so, incorporate measures to <br />eliminate conditions for a dew point to occur. One such <br />measure is installing an insulation layer directly below the slab <br />and vapor retarder. <br />X1.7 Moisture Entrapment Due to Rainfall or Ground <br />Water Intrusion—Moisture entrapment can occur beneath slabs <br />when the vapor retarder is placed below a fill course or vapor <br />retarder protection layer, and the fill material takes on water <br />from rainfall, saw -cutting, curing, cleaning or other sources. If <br />a fill course or vapor retarder protection layer is used, the <br />extent of moisture entrapment can be reduced by scheduling <br />concrete placements before rainfall and by sealing any entry <br />points for water in the completed slab. If a fill course or vapor <br />retarder protection layer is used, the vapor retarder must be <br />turned up at the perimeter of the slab to protect the fill course <br />from lateral entrance of moisture. <br />X1.8 Ensure there is no water accumulation on top of the <br />vapor retarder prior to placing of concrete. <br />Copyright by ASTM InPI (all rights reserved), Tue Apr 21 13:01 53 EDT 2015 3 <br />Downloaded -'printed by V <br />Lillian Babcock (Condor Earth Technologies, Inc.) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.