My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1990-1993
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1990-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2025 10:07:45 AM
Creation date
12/20/2021 11:44:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1990-1993
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433 - LANDFILL DISPOSAL SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
Site Address
6484 N WAVERLY RD LINDEN 95236
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Y <br />�J <br />KIKLEI N FELDER <br />March 26, 1990 <br />File: 24 -220002 -BOO r <br />Mr. Tom Horton <br />San Joaquin County <br />Department of Public Works <br />P. O. Box 1810 <br />Stockton, California 95201 <br />Subject: Subchapter 15 Monitoring Program Implementation <br />Foothill Landfill <br />Dear Mr. Horton: <br />The following information addresses the questions and concerns expressed by Mr. Jeffery <br />Tucker, in a letter to you dated October 18, 1989 (Attachment 1). <br />1. The Kleinfelder report on Subchapter 15 Monitoring Program Implementation, <br />Foothill Landfill, San Joaquin County, California, dated September 14, 1989 does <br />contain a map of ground water elevation contours, see Plate 3 of that report. <br />2. At the time of the September Subchapter 15 implementation report, Kleinfelder did <br />not have well construction details for LW -1. This resulted in errors in Table 1 of <br />that report concerning LW -1. Since then we have contacted Purviance Drilling, and <br />they have provided us with well construction details. The driller's log for LW -1 is <br />attached (Attachment 2). The correct information is contained on Table 1 of the <br />Monitoring Reports for October 1989 and January 1990, both dated March 7, 1990. <br />We have included a copy of this table (Attachment 3) showing the correct well <br />construction details for all three wells with this letter. For LW -1, the TOP is -1.6 <br />feet, and the BOP is -131.6 feet. Both of these elevations are referenced to mean <br />sea level. The screened interval for this well is 130 feet. <br />3. Pumping from LW -1 may affect ground water flow in the area around LW -1, but it <br />appears to be a local effect. LW -1 appears to be pumping water from the Mehrten <br />Formation. This aquifer is generally very transmissive, and provides a substantial <br />amount of ground water for the east side of San Joaquin Valley. A DWR study on <br />San Joaquin County groundwater resources (Bulletin No. 146, 1967) indicates that <br />the average regional capability of the Mehrten formation is approximately 1,000 <br />gallons per minute. LW -1 pumps only approximately 1500 gallons every 15 minutes, <br />an average of 100 gallons per rmnute. <br />Table 1 shows depth of water in the three wells for the Foothill Landfill. On July 5 <br />and 10, 1989, water levels were recorded during the day while LW -1 was being <br />heavily used by Foothill Landfill. On July 27, 1989, water levels were recorded early <br />in the morning before Foothill Landfill began usin& LW -1. The water levels in <br />MW -1 and MW -2 were ap roximately equal at the times when LW -1 was drawing <br />water (7/5/89 and 7/10/89, and when it was not (7/27/89). Therefore, pumping in <br />LW -1 does not appear to affect the ground water gradient at MW -1 and MW -2. <br />Previously we assumed that the depth -to -ground water in LW -1 on July 10, 1989 <br />exceeded 300 feet due to pumping. It now appears that an obstruction, which <br />prevented ground water depth to be measured ;in LW -1 during January 1990 (see <br />KLEINFELDER 9795 Business Park Drive, Sacramento, CA 95827 (916) 366-1701 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.