My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014565 (2)
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FAIROAKS
>
8350
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-86-12
>
SU0014565 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2022 4:46:01 PM
Creation date
1/4/2022 9:32:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014565
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
SU-86-12
STREET_NUMBER
8350
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
FAIROAKS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
APN
24813001
ENTERED_DATE
12/8/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8350 W FAIROAKS RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
805
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the limited adaptability of apricots was prob- <br />ably responsible for this earlier acreage <br />expansion and its subsequent decline. Then, <br />in the early 1960s, San Joaquin acreage <br />expanded once again, partially offsetting the <br />long decline in Central Coast acreage. Along <br />with this change in location of apricot <br />acreage came a major shift in its varietal <br />composition In the 1950s, 80 percent of the <br />state's crop was Blenheim (Royal), a firm, <br />round, well -colored, highly -flavored fruit. The <br />Tildon variety increased its share from 13 <br />percent in 1950 to almost half in the 19708, <br />because it is better adapted to the high <br />inland temperatures of the San Joaquin Val- <br />ley. Also, a major canning problem occurred <br />in the 1970s with Blenheime but not with <br />Tildons--an enzyme resulted in softened <br />mushy fruit. The Tildon has generally higher <br />yields than Blenheim, but is also lighter in <br />color, flatter in shape, only fair in fresh taste, <br />rather bland in canned taste, with a poor dry- <br />ing ratio. Nearly all the San Joaquin Valley <br />TSldons are canned. Recently, several promis- <br />ing new varieties have been introduced in the <br />San Joaquin Valley, e.g., Patterson, as a pos- <br />sible replacement for Tildon, and Castleton, <br />which may claim a reasonable place on the <br />fresh market. <br />Acreage in the Sacramento Valley <br />(chiefly at Winters and Fairfield) has declined <br />rather gradually dunng the entire postwar <br />period. This area is an early shipping district <br />characterized by relatively warm spring <br />nights that ripen fruit before the arrival of <br />high summer temperatures. About one-half <br />of California's fresh apricots come from the <br />Winters area in Yolo and Solano counties. <br />They are marketed in late May and early <br />June. Lately, an increasing share of this <br />area's crop is being dried since it is one of the <br />few remaining areas where the excellent -for - <br />drying Blenheims are still grown. <br />Southern California, a major producer of <br />apricots before 1930, is no longer of commen <br />cial importance. Pnncipal southern Califor- <br />nia districts were once near Hemet (Riverside <br />County) and in southeastern Ventura County <br />near Moorpark. <br />27 <br />pends in Acreage, Yields, and Production <br />Encouraged by high grower returns for <br />dried fruit in export markets, apricot acreage <br />increased in the 1920s to an all time high of <br />83,000 bearing acres in 1928, but it has since <br />declined markedly. The rate of decline <br />increased as a result of reduced plantings <br />during the war years and extensive pulling of <br />older trees. However, an increase in new <br />plantings in the late 1950s offset pullings, <br />resulting in acreage stabilizing at about <br />37,000 bearing acres during much of the <br />1960s (Figure 12A). More recently, the <br />decline in per capita consumption of apricots <br />in all forms is the result in part of increased <br />competition from other fruits. Static and <br />even decreasing grower returns characterize <br />the more recent period, resulting in further <br />reductions in apricot acreage. Most of this <br />divestment occurred in the Central Coast <br />region, but San Joaquin Valley bearing <br />acreage also appears to have peaked in the <br />late 1970s and is now somewhat lower 'Fig- <br />ure 11). <br />Apricot yields vary greatly from year to <br />year. Alternate bearing is partly responsible <br />for this, as is unfavorable weather during <br />blossoming or ripening. A fruit yield varia <br />bility study at the University of California in <br />1961 found that apricots ranked 17th out of <br />19 fruits and nuts in an index of yield depen <br />dability. (Only avocados and olives were <br />found to be more variable.) These wide <br />fluctuations can be seen in Figure 12B, rang- <br />ing from highs of about 6.5 tons per acre to <br />lows of 3 tons or less. For example, the 1983 <br />crop was down because of poor pollination due <br />to rain during the blooming period. The yield <br />trend through these ups and downs was some- <br />what upward through the 1950s as commer- <br />cial acreage became more concentrated in <br />better -suited areas. Since the early 1960s, <br />the trend appears nearly horizontal with the <br />state average at about 5 tons an acre. Yields <br />of better than 10 tons per acre, however, are <br />average in some orchards on the west side of <br />the San Joaquin Valley; those in Stanislaus <br />County are generally highest in the state. <br />Total production from year to year <br />strongly reflects the variation in yield, and <br />the historical trend in production has a pro- <br />nounced downward tilt reflecting the con- <br />tinual decrease in bearing apricot acreage in <br />California. <br />v~: <br />:.a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.