Laserfiche WebLink
in 1983. Along with the increasing prefer- <br />ence for shelled walnuts, the older Payne <br />variety (15.2 percent) and the newer Ashley <br />(6.5 percent), Serr (11.2 percent), Vina (3.0 <br />percent), and Chico (1.5 percent) have <br />increased their share of the state's walnut <br />acreage. Some of the newer varieties have a <br />high kernel yield, bear early in a tree's life, <br />and produce heavy crops. <br />Location of Production <br />At the beginning of the 19208, three- <br />fourths of the state's walnut acreage was <br />located in the southern coastal counties, with <br />30 percent of the total in Los Angeles County <br />and 17 percent in Orange County. Although <br />southern California walnut acreage remained <br />at approximately 80,000 acres until just <br />before World War II, acreage increased else- <br />where in the state. Rapid divestiture in <br />southern California walnut acreage began <br />and continued long after the war (Figure 36). <br />Higher production costs, increased competi- <br />tion from alternative crops, pest infestations, <br />higher yield potentials elsewhere, and rapid <br />urbanization accelerated tree removals. <br />Southern California's lovely level orchards <br />with large handsome shade trees and good <br />access roads proved ideal for suburban <br />development. <br />Central Coast postwar acreage, pri- <br />marily Contra Costa, Santa Clara, and Lake <br />counties increased rapidly at first, peaking in <br />1958, and then declined gradually as urbani- <br />zation began in earnest there, particularly in <br />Contra Costa and Santa Clara counties. <br />Central Valley bearing acreage with its <br />relative freedom from urban pressure, less <br />costly water and land resources, and fewer <br />diseases has increased steadily in both the <br />San Joaquin and Sacramento valleys (Figure <br />36). Growth in San Joaquin Valley acreage <br />was widespread, centering around Stockton, <br />Modesto, and Visalia. In the Sacramento <br />Valley production has centered around Yuba <br />City -Marysville, Colusa, Chico, and Red Bluff. <br />Trends in Acreage, Yields, and Production <br />As can be seen comparing Figures 36 <br />and 37A, the state's aggregate acreage <br />figures mask the radical shifts in location <br />that have occurred. Rapid increases in Cen- <br />961 <br />13.3-35 <br />tral Valley acreage have more than offset <br />declines in the Southern California and Cen- <br />tral Coast regions. <br />Yield trends moved slightly upward <br />until the early 1970a when a more pro. <br />nounced increase is seen, albeit with wider <br />fluctuations about the average (Figure 37B). <br />Closer planting of trees, more highly produc- <br />tive varieties, improved irrigation and insect <br />control, and better pruning practices are <br />some of the factors responsible for the gen. <br />eral upward trend. The pronounced yield <br />increases of the 19709 are likely associated <br />with the maturing of the trees in the Central <br />Valley. <br />Production patterns over time reflect <br />those of yields but are also moved upward by <br />the increase in bearing acreage (Figure 37C). <br />The all-time high of 225,000 tons in 1981 was <br />surpassed the next year with 234,000 tons. <br />The 1983 production was down somewhat to <br />199,000 tons, but still above the tonnage of <br />1980. Preliminary figures for 1984 show pro. <br />duction matching the 1981 level. These large <br />crops have resulted in substantial carryovers <br />and marketing problems. <br />