Laserfiche WebLink
. I <br /> 1 <br /> Mr . Trinkle said that if the entire section were to be developed, that <br /> would make a public water system feasible; however, it is not feasible <br /> for 13 homes. <br /> Mr. Curran commented that many people will be coming to this area from <br /> the Bay Area and they will have high expectations on water. Buyers of <br /> the lots who will be living there have to have their interests <br /> considered. <br /> Mr. Trinkle commented on drainage in the area. He said that the <br /> drainage is exceptionally fine. <br /> Mr . Gau noted that he did not believe that Banta-Carbona Ir.r.ig.ation <br /> District would approve terminal drainage to their facility. <br /> There was continued discussion about the wells. In answer to a <br /> question, Mr. Trinkle said that wells in the area are drilled to a 206 <br /> foot depth with a solid casing and sealed to 100 feet. <br /> Dave Olmstead, 7549 Linne Road, Tracy, said he is not the applicant <br /> but he has a proposed subdivision about 1/4 mile from this particular <br /> project which will be before the Planning Commission some time in the <br /> future. He said that any of the conditions placed on this subdivision <br /> could affect his project. Regarding water, he said that if they went <br /> to a public water system, they would be allowed 100 parts per billion <br /> (ppb) of chloroform. If they went to a private water system, they <br /> would be allowed 0. 19 ppb. He said the aquifers are drawing at about <br /> 200 ' on the individual wells as well as , possibly, the public wells. <br /> He said he understood that 100 ppb is not a health hazard. <br /> Mr. Olmstead said that any large public water system uses chlorine <br /> for purifying the water. This produces chloroform. A public water <br /> system will not protect the people any more than would individual <br /> wells. He asked that the Commission recommend rewording of <br /> Recommended Conditions Nos. 2 (d) and 3 (c ) . This would allow indivi- <br /> dual wells and provide that the contaminant level on the individual <br /> wells meet Title 22; and that the chloroform level in those wells not <br /> exceed 100 ppb. <br /> Mr . Olmstead went on to say that it would not be economically feasible <br /> to put a public water system in that area. He also said that the area <br /> has outstanding drainage. He said he did not think that the size of <br /> the required drainage pond is excessive. He said that Condition 3 (c ) <br /> should be modified to the wording of Board Order 76-4201. <br /> He said that his suggested wording on Condition Nos. 2 (d ) and 3 (c ) is <br /> as follows: " Individual wells are acceptable providing that the con- <br /> taminant level of the constituents does not exceed Title 22 , and that <br /> the chloroform does not exceed 100 ppb. The test well would be tested <br /> before the subdivision is commenced. It would not be monitored after <br /> the subdivision is put in . In answer to a question as to what would <br /> happen if Title 22 could not be met, Mr. Olmstead said that a system <br /> can be put in for purifying the cold water within the house. <br /> PC: 9/10/67 <br /> -3- MINUTES <br />