Laserfiche WebLink
L10 - <br />SAN JOAOUIN COUNTY <br />DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING INSPECTION <br />1810 E HAZELTON AVE., STOCKTON, CA 95205 <br />PLANNING PHONE: 209/944-3722 <br />BUILDING PHONE: 209/944-3701 <br />July 18, 1985 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Planning Commission <br />FROM: Planning Division <br />Item No. S <br />CHET DAVISSON <br />Director <br />JERRY HERZICK <br />Deputy Director <br />LOU THANAS <br />Deputy Director <br />SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONS OF MAJOR <br />SUBDIVISION APPLICATION NO. 5-81-10 OF BEN SCHAFFER, ET <br />AL (C/O BAUMBACH & PIAZZA) FOR 102 -LOT RURAL RESIDENTIAL <br />SUBDIVISION, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF JAHANT ROAD, <br />WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY 99, COLLIERVILLE, NORTH OF LODI <br />Application No.: 5-81-10 <br />Applicant Ben Schaffer <br />BACKGROUND <br />The Board of Supervisors approved the subdivision on October 5, <br />1981. On March 17, 1983, the Planning Commission approved a <br />time extension for eighteen months, which expired on October <br />15, 1984. On November 8, 1984, the Board of Supervisors <br />approved an extension of time until October 15, 1985. <br />The issue that has arisen is that the subdivider now wants to <br />develop the project in units. There was no mention of units <br />when the map was filed, and all of the conditions were devel- <br />oped with the assumption that the subdivision would be done in <br />one unit. <br />The Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Section 66456.1) pro- <br />vides that multiple Final Maps relating to a conditionally <br />approved Tentative Map may be filed prior to the expiration of <br />a Tentative Map. When the Woodson Estates subdivision was <br />approved, this section was only applicable if the subdivider <br />informed the Planning Commission of his intention to file <br />multiple maps of the Tentative Map. By thus informing the <br />Planning Commission of this intent, conditions could be imposed <br />which could be applicable for development by units. The con- <br />ditions, in this case, do not address partial development <br />because no information was provided to the Planning Commission <br />and Board of Supervisors of the intent to proceed with develop- <br />ment in units. The Map Act has since been amended to allow the <br />filing of multiple Final Maps if the local agency and the sub - <br />