Laserfiche WebLink
Ms . Angie Manetti <br /> August 2 , 2018 <br /> Page 2 <br /> toward generator status . U . S . EPA added that the weight of the container does not <br /> need to be counted toward generator status . <br /> CRA's request stems primarily from concern that "counting the weight of these non- <br /> empty containers towards generator status almost ensures that many pharmacies will <br /> become higher level hazardous waste generators . " <br /> RATIONALE FOR REGULATORY APPROACH <br /> CRA recommends that DTSC follow recent U . S . EPA guidance which " consistently <br /> support [s] the intent of the [federal] regulations to only regulate the residue in the <br /> container, not the container itself." <br /> In reviewing CRA' s recommendation , DTSC agrees that U . S . EPA' s 2011 memorandum <br /> is more consistent with federal hazardous waste regulations applicable to containers . <br /> As was stated in that letter, if a container holding an acute hazardous waste is not <br /> emptied as specified in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) , section 261 . 7 ( b)( 3 ) " . . . <br /> is not considered RCRA empty even though the pharmaceutical is fully dispensed . If <br /> the container is not RCRA empty then the residues, [as specified in 40 Code of Federal <br /> Regulations , section 261 . 33( c)] are regulated as hazardous waste . " <br /> Furthermore, this approach is consistent with other criteria in federal regulations . The <br /> federal container requirement states the following in 40 Code of Federal Regulation , <br /> section 261 . 7(a )( 2) concerning non-empty containers : <br /> `Any hazardous waste in either a container that is not empty or an inner liner <br /> removed from a container that is not empty, as defined in paragraph (b) of this <br /> section, is subject to regulation underparts 269 through 268, 270 and 924 of this <br /> chapter and to the notification requirements of section 3090 of RCRA. " <br /> Under this requirement , it was not U . S , EPA's intent to regulate the container itself but <br /> only the hazardous waste within , i . e . , the acute hazardous waste residue remaining in <br /> the container. <br /> However, DTSC cannot apply the 2011 memorandum in California because it is <br /> inconsistent with DTSC's hazardous waste regulations applicable to contaminated <br /> containers . When DTSC adopted regulations for contaminated containers, it did not <br /> adopt U . S . EPA's approach of addressing only the residues inside the containers . <br /> Instead , DTSC adopted container regulations that consider the whole contaminated <br /> container hazardous waste and not just the residual inside . California Code of <br /> Regulations , title 22 , section 66261 . 7( r) states : <br />