My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2016-2017
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2016-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2025 10:07:34 AM
Creation date
1/7/2022 10:13:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2016-2017
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433 - LANDFILL DISPOSAL SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
Site Address
6484 N WAVERLY RD LINDEN 95236
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
367
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Foothill Landfill <br /> Preliminary Plans <br /> December 21,2016 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> - - --2.--- -Final-Cover-Dgai -T-he-Plans-assufrle-that-an-interim/foundation-(inter-mediate-c-over-)-iayer-is--___- <br /> anticipated to be in place at the time of final cover construction. The closure cost estimate <br /> excludes this layer in the foundation layer cover cost. This is not acceptable. <br /> Estimated closure costs are to include all activities yet to be completed at the time of preparation <br /> of the estimate. Since it is unknown(1)the quantity of intermediate cover that may be present at <br /> final closure(thickness initially placed, erosion, etc.)and (2)the quality of the material (not <br /> placed under final cover quality control conditions,wear over time, etc.), it is premature to <br /> presume that there will be sufficient quality and quantity of the material suitable for final cover. <br /> At the time of partial or final closure design and implementation,the suitability of any existing <br /> intermediate cover could be investigated at that time. <br /> The closure cost estimate must be revised to include the cost for the assumed in place material. <br /> 3. Final Cover Stability: There is no stability analysis of the final cover. While 27 CCR 21090(a) <br /> specifically requires slope stability analysis if final grades are steeper than 3:1 or a geosynthetic <br /> component is used in the final cover design, the'section does not exempt the design from slope <br /> stability analysis. Moreover,27 CCR 21145(a)requires the operator to ensure the integrity of <br /> final slopes under both static and dynamic conditions to protect public health and safety and <br /> prevent damage. Therefore,stability analysis on the most critical final cover slope interface <br /> (e.g.,soil/trash interface or internal soil interface)be run to demonstrate the stability of the final <br /> cover design. <br /> Since the previously analyzed global slope stability has shown the site to be stable (Factor of <br /> Safety> 1.5), the stability analysis may be simplified by either(1) demonstrating that the weakest <br /> final cover interface is more stable than the waste mass or(2)demonstrate that K,1KX is> 1.5. <br /> 4. Cost Estimates: Cost estimates shall be updated at each permit review or revision submittal and <br /> shall be based on costs the state may incur if the state would have to assume responsibility for <br /> corrective action due to the failure of the operator/owner to properly and adequately perform any <br /> or all of the activities. Updates of cost estimates shall be based on the current costs on a unit <br /> basis(unit costs). Cost estimate adjustments based only on inflation factors are not acceptable. <br /> The costs included as JTD Appendix I (Bullet 1 above)are for the annual inflation adjustment. <br /> These estimates do not meet the regulatory requirement for updated cost estimates at each <br /> permit review or revision application. <br /> The operator needs to submit updated cost estimates that are detailed and justified and reflect <br /> the potential state cost as required by 27 CCR§§21815, 21820, and 21840. <br /> 5. Postclosure Maintenance Costs: The postclosure maintenance cost estimate is to include the <br /> replacement cost for all capital items (e.g., landfill gas and ground water monitoring wells, <br /> drainage conveyances,fencing, etc.)at least once during the initial minimum 30-year postclosure <br /> maintenance period. In other words,the estimate is to account for replacement of all monitoring <br /> wells,fencing,drainage conveyance, etc. It is unclear if these costs are included in the estimate. <br /> The postclosure maintenance cost estimate must be revised to include the replacement costs,or <br /> alternatively, it can be indicated where these costs are already included in the estimate. <br /> Should you have any questions or comments concerning the above matter, please contact Diane <br /> Nordstrom-Lamkin or Michael Wochnick at(916)341-6448 or(916)341-6289, respectively. Alternatively, <br /> Closure staff may be reached by email at diane.nordstrom-lamkin@calrecyle.ca.gov or <br /> michael.wochnick@calrecycle.ca.gov. <br /> CC. Kevin Taylor,Manager,Permits and Assistance South Section <br /> Dave Otsubo,Supervisor,Permits and Assistance North Unit <br /> Elizabeth Felix,Financial Assurances Unit <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.