Laserfiche WebLink
A2 REGIONAL AQUIFER-SYSTEM ANALYSIS-CENTRAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA <br />tion of preliminary reports on water quality by Fogelman <br />(1982a, 1982b, 1983); water use by Williamson (1981) and <br />Diamond and Williamson (1983); hydrogeology by Page <br />(1981, 1983), French, Page, and Bertoldi (1982, 1983), <br />Page and Bertoldi (1983), French, Page, Bertoldi, and <br />Fogelman (1983), and Berkstresser and others (1985); <br />and ground-water hydraulics, regional flow, and aquifer <br />mechanics by Williamson and Prudic (1986) and Prudic <br />and Williamson (1986). In addition, Nady and Larragueta <br />(1983a, 1983b) and Mullen and Nady (1985) described <br />streamflow and irrigation development. <br />PURPOSE AND SCOPE <br />The purpose of Professional Paper 1401 is to describe <br />major aspects of the geology, hydrology, and geochem- <br />istry of the Central Valley aquifer system. These descrip- <br />tions are derived largely from the study results and <br />preliminary reports of the 5-year study; however, they <br />also utilize the extensive hydrologic literature on the <br />California Central Valley (see references cited in chap- <br />ters A-D). <br />Professional Paper 1401 consists of the following chap- <br />ters: <br />Chapter A (this report) summarizes the important <br />aspects of the geologic framework, regional ground- <br />water flow, effects of development, and ground-water <br />quality in the Central Valley. <br />Chapter B (Hull, 1984) describes the geochemistry of <br />ground water in the Sacramento Valley. <br />Chapter C (Page, 1986) describes the geologic frame- <br />work of the Central Valley, with emphasis on textural <br />changes in the alluvial deposits that constitute the <br />aquifer system. <br />Chapter D (Williamson and others, 1989) discusses <br />ground-water hydraulics, with emphasis on an analysis of <br />regional ground-water flow prior to and after extensive <br />ground-water withdrawals. This regional analysis is <br />based on computer simulation and presents a new, <br />somewhat different concept of the aquifer system. <br />BASIN ENVIRONMENT <br />The Central Valley of California, viewed from the air <br />or on a shaded relief map (fig. 1A), stands out as a notable <br />topographic basin. It is about 400 mi long and averages <br />about 50 mi in width. Surrounded on all sides by <br />mountain ranges, the valley has only one natural outlet <br />through which surface water drains. That outlet, the <br />Carquinez Strait, cuts through the central Coast Ranges <br />(fig. 1A) on the west boundary of the valley. In this <br />study, the boundary of the Central Valley represents the <br />areal extent of the valley's aquifer system rather than a <br />physiographic boundary. The aquifer system's boundary <br />is defined as coincident with the topographically highest <br />occurrence of alluvial fan or alluvial plain deposits (allu- <br />vial boundary) of Pleistocene or Holocene age. In the <br />northern part of the valley, discordant with the uniform <br />flatness of the landscape, is the only notable topographic <br />feature, Sutter Buttes (figs. 1A and 2). There, north and <br />south Buttes, remnants of an ancient volcanic plug, rise <br />to altitudes of 1,860 and 2,130 ft above sea level, <br />respectively. <br />The Central Valley is composed of parts of four <br />hydrographic subregions or drainage basins named for <br />the major natural surface-water feature in each subre- <br />gion (fig. I A). Sacramento Valley, the northernmost <br />third of the Central Valley, has an area of about 4,400 mi2 <br />and is drained by its namesake, the Sacramento River. Of <br />the four hydrographic subregions, the Sacramento Valley <br />is the least intensively developed. San Joaquin Valley, <br />the southern two-thirds of the Central Valley, is made up <br />of parts of two subregions: the San Joaquin Basin and, at <br />the southern end, a basin of interior drainage called the <br />Tulare Basin after a Pleistocene lake that occupied most <br />of the area. The fourth hydrographic subregion is the <br />Delta, a low-lying area that drains directly to the <br />Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta rather than to either river <br />(fig. 1A). The lower part of the Delta subregion consists <br />of wetlands interspersed with hundreds of miles of <br />channels and numerous islands. <br />Climate in the Central Valley is the Mediterranean <br />type (Blair and Fite, 1957, p. 323). Average annual <br />precipitation ranges from 13 to 26 in. in the Sacramento <br />Valley and from 5 to 16 in. in the San Joaquin Valley. <br />About 85 percent of the annual precipitation occurs from <br />November to April. Summers are hot; winters are mild, <br />allowing a long growing season. In contrast to the low <br />precipitation in the valley, mean annual precipitation in <br />the adjacent Sierra Nevada increases with altitude and <br />ranges from 40 to more than 90 in. (Rantz, 1969). Much <br />of the precipitation in the mountains is snow, especially in <br />the higher southern Sierra Nevada. Variations in the <br />volume of snowpack and delays in its melting produce <br />differences in the timing of runoff in the two valleys. <br />Peak runoff into the Sacramento Valley generally lags <br />peak precipitation in the surrounding mountains by 1 to <br />2 months whereas peak runoff in the San Joaquin Valley <br />generally lags peak precipitation by 5 to 6 months (fig. 3). <br />Streamflow, a very important factor in the water <br />supply of the Central Valley, is almost entirely depend- <br />ent on precipitation in the Sierra Nevada and part of the <br />Klamath Mountains in the north (fig. 1A). No perennial <br />streams of any significant size enter the valley from the <br />west, except for Stony Creek, Cache Creek, and Putah <br />Creek at the northwest end of the valley (fig. IB). Mean <br />annual streamflow entering the Central Valley around its <br />perimeter is 31.7 million acre-ft.