Laserfiche WebLink
A8 REGIONAL AQUIFER-SYSTEM ANALYSIS-CENTRAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA <br />1986). Sedimentary deposits include both marine and <br />continental deposits and range in age from Jurassic to <br />Holocene. The valley is bordered on the east by the <br />Sierra Nevada and on the west by the Coast Ranges (fig. <br />6). The Sierra Nevada is the source of most of the <br />sediment that underlies the valley. <br />GEOLOGIC SETTING <br />Although there are differing viewpoints among geolo- <br />gists as to the details of the origin of structural features <br />we can view today in the Central Valley, there is general <br />agreement on the larger aspects of the emergence of <br />California as a landmass and the subsequent formation of <br />the valley (King, 1977, p. 177). The formation of the <br />Sierra Nevada and the Coast Ranges is important to <br />understanding the deposition of aquifer material in the <br />Central Valley as well as to understanding the distribu- <br />tion and movement of ground water. <br />To the east of the Central Valley is the Sierra Nevada. <br />It is the largest single mountain range in the contermi- <br />nous United States and is about 350 mi long and 55 to 80 <br />mi wide about as long and wide as the Central Valley. <br />The Sierra Nevada is composed primarily of granite and <br />related plutonic rocks but includes metasedimentary and <br />metavolcanic rocks that range in age from Late Jurassic <br />to Ordovician or perhaps older. The Sierra Nevada <br />batholith was emplaced after the Late Jurassic but prior <br />to the Late Cretaceous (Shelton, 1966, p. 385). <br />The Sierra Nevada, like the Central Valley, is asym- <br />metric; the east side is considerably steeper than the <br />west side (fig. 6), suggesting that the block was tilted <br />upward toward the east. At the base of the east slope is <br />evidence of recent faulting at several locales, while steep <br />canyons have been cut into the gently sloping west side. <br />Based on the steep canyons, Shelton (1966, p. 388) <br />deduced that the huge granitic batholith was at a low <br />elevation long enough to acquire a fairly flat erosional <br />surface before it was tilted in successive stages. Wells <br />drilled in the San Joaquin and Sacramento Valleys <br />penetrated granitic rocks at increasing depths toward the <br />west, indicating that the granite exposed in the Sierra <br />Nevada is only a small part of the whole mass. <br />Uplift of the granitic rocks resulted in increased <br />precipitation in the Sierra Nevada, particularly near its <br />crest, which in places exceeds 14,000 ft altitude. Warm, <br />moist airmasses from the Pacific Ocean are forced aloft by <br />the mountain range, causing the airmasses to cool and the <br />moisture to condense, resulting in heavy precipitation <br />that exceeds 80 in./yr in places (Rantz, 1969). Because <br />the crest of the range is near the east side, much of the <br />runoff is westward to the Central Valley and is a major <br />source of water to the valley. The streams that debouch <br />from the Sierra Nevada also have supplied a major part <br />of the recent and older Cenozoic sediments that have <br />been deposited in the valley. <br />Bailey and others (1970) described the significance and <br />processes of the overland thrusting of the Mesozoic <br />marine sediments to the formation of the Coast Ranges <br />and to the deformation of the Great Valley sequence. Two <br />important hydrologic points can be made from Bailey's <br />geologic discussion. First, the emergence of the Coast <br />Range thrust and subsequent development of the Coast <br />Ranges established an orographic barrier for moisture- <br />laden onshore oceanic winds; as a result, the Central <br />Valley effectively was put into a rain shadow since the <br />formation of its west boundary an important factor in <br />considering the source and distribution of ground-water <br />recharge to the valley. A second factor that needs to be <br />emphasized is the extensive deformation of the marine <br />beds of the Great Valley sequence on the west side of the <br />valley. In addition to establishing the asymmetric nature <br />of the valley trough, these highly contorted beds may <br />form a fault zone under the west side of the valley <br />(Oakeshott, 1971, p. 289). The fault zone and the beds are <br />barriers to ground-water flow. Variations in the chemical <br />quality of ground water and in hydraulic heads are <br />observed in closely spaced wells of similar construction <br />drilled near the east boundary of the Coast Ranges <br />(Hotchkiss and Balding, 1971). <br />Although the ancestral Sacramento and San Joaquin <br />Valleys were created by the emergence of many areas of <br />the Coast Ranges by middle Cretaceous time, parts of the <br />Central Valley remained inundated by the Pacific Ocean <br />until late Pliocene time (about 2 to 3 million years before <br />present). These inundated areas were continuously <br />changing in size and shape as the Coast Ranges emerged. <br />As a result, both marine and continental sediments were <br />deposited. Marine deposition was dominant in the Cen- <br />tral Valley from the Paleocene to the beginning of the <br />Oligocene (fig. 7). During the early Oligocene, marine <br />deposition was restricted to the southern part of the San <br />Joaquin Valley; during the Miocene, marine deposits <br />were laid down along the west flank of the San Joaquin <br />Valley and throughout most of the southern San Joaquin <br />Valley (fig. 7). The seas had retreated by the Pleistocene, <br />and only continental sediments were deposited during <br />the Pleistocene and Holocene. <br />Marine deposits of Tertiary age, therefore, underlie <br />large parts of the Central Valley; they crop out around <br />Sutter Buttes, along the southwest flank of the Sacra- <br />mento Valley, and along the west, southwest, south, and <br />southeast flanks of the San Joaquin Valley. <br />Because of many changes in the depositional environ- <br />ment, the marine deposits differ greatly in sediment <br />type, sorting, and thickness, and have been given nu-