|
A12 REGIONAL AQUIFER-SYSTEM ANALYSIS-CENTRAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
<br />limits that an error in estimating their thickness has no
<br />effect on the flow-system analysis.
<br />WATER-BEARING CHARACTERISTICS OF
<br />THE AQUIFER SYSTEM
<br />(POST-EOCENE CONTINENTAL DEPOSITS)
<br />The post-Eocene continental deposits that constitute
<br />the Central Valley aquifer system contain mostly fluvial
<br />deposits and interbedded lacustrine deposits but include
<br />some volcanic material. The continental deposits consist
<br />predominantly of lenses of gravel, sand, silt, and clay.
<br />The numerous lenses of fine-grained (silt, sandy silt,
<br />sandy clay, and clay) sediments are distributed through-
<br />out the valley and in most places constitute over 50
<br />percent of the total thickness penetrated by wells, as
<br />determined from electric logs (Page, 1986).
<br />Most of these fine-grained lenses are not areally
<br />extensive; however, several major ones were mapped,
<br />principally near the axis of the San Joaquin Valley. The
<br />most notable is the Corcoran Clay Member (Pleistocene)
<br />of the Tulare Formation (Pliocene and Pleistocene),
<br />which is part of the modified E-clay of Page (1986) and
<br />underlies most of the west side of the San Joaquin Valley.
<br />This diatomaceous clay unit underlies an area of approx-
<br />imately 5,000 mi2 (Page, 1986) and ranges in thickness
<br />from near zero to at least 160 ft beneath the present bed
<br />of Tulare Lake (Davis and others, 1959; Page, 1986). The
<br />northern extent of the Corcoran Clay Member is not
<br />known because of the lack of well data north of Stockton,
<br />particularly in the Delta area. A diatomaceous clay
<br />similar in composition to that of the Corcoran Clay
<br />Member was present in a test hole drilled northwest of
<br />Sacramento, and drillers have filed reports showing a
<br />diatomaceous clay in several deeper wells north of
<br />Stockton (Page and Bertoldi, 1983). Laboratory tests of
<br />the clay indicate that it is highly susceptible to compac-
<br />tion, like the Corcoran Clay Member; however, the clay
<br />was not present in six other test holes northwest of
<br />Sacramento, so the full extent of it is not known.
<br />The Corcoran Clay Member is important to the hy-
<br />draulics of the aquifer system in that prior to develop-
<br />ment it acted as an effective confining unit. However, the
<br />drilling of large-diameter wells through the Corcoran and
<br />the practice of perforating wells both above and below it
<br />have made the present effectiveness of the Corcoran as a
<br />confining unit questionable.
<br />In the basis of drillers' logs, electric logs from gas wells
<br />and the water wells, plus information from seven U.S.
<br />Geological Survey test holes drilled as part of this study,
<br />Page (1986) concluded that no extensive fine-grained
<br />lenses underlie the Sacramento Valley. However, there
<br />are two areas of mostly fine-grained sediments interbed-
<br />ded with coarse-grained sediments along the northeast
<br />flank of the Sacramento Valley adjacent to and south of
<br />Chico (Page, 1986, fig. 8), at depths from 600 to 900 ft,
<br />and along the southwest flank of the Sacramento Valley
<br />north of Cache Creek in T. 3 N., at depths from about 600
<br />to 2,700 ft (Page, 1986, figs. 8-14).
<br />Relating aquifers within the post-Eocene continental
<br />deposits to specific formations in the subsurface is
<br />difficult. In the valley, investigators use mainly physiog-
<br />raphy, weathering characteristics, and soils to map upper
<br />Cenozoic formations; however, in the subsurface, espe-
<br />cially under saturated conditions, equivalents of surface
<br />units cannot be mapped with any certainty because
<br />differences in lithology are not apparent. In the Central
<br />Valley, then, physical properties of the aquifer materials
<br />and the distribution of these properties are more impor-
<br />tant than the delineation of formation boundaries to
<br />understanding regional and local flow patterns and to
<br />quantifying water in storage. The general relations in the
<br />Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys among geologic
<br />units, hydrologic units, and layers used in the computer
<br />simulation of ground-water flow are shown in figure 9.
<br />STORAGE COEFFICIENT
<br />Storage coefficient is the amount of water that can be
<br />released from or added to the ground-water reservoir. It
<br />is usually defined as the volume of water an aquifer
<br />system releases from or takes into storage per unit
<br />surface area of aquifer per unit change in head (Lohman
<br />and others, 1972, p. 8). In the zone of water-table
<br />fluctuations, the storage coefficient is virtually equal to
<br />the amount of water released from storage by gravity
<br />drainage, referred to as specific yield. Below the zone of
<br />water-table fluctuations, the storage coefficient is the
<br />amount of water released by compression of the sedi-
<br />ments and expansion of the water. This amount is usually
<br />much less than the amount released by gravity drainage.
<br />Laboratory values of specific yield and porosity are
<br />shown in table 1. For the purposes of uniformity, only
<br />reported values obtained by the "sample saturation and
<br />drainage" method described by Johnson (1967, p. D5)
<br />were used in table 1. In general, sand yields more water
<br />from gravity drainage than fine-grained deposits like silt
<br />and clay, even though the porosities are nearly the same.
<br />The fine-grained deposits usually have much smaller
<br />specific-yield values because the tiny pores do not drain
<br />readily.
<br />Williamson and others (1989, table 7) used specific-
<br />yield values for aquifer materials similar to those shown
<br />in table 1 and then estimated an aggregated specific yield
<br />for the first few hundred feet of saturated sediment on
<br />the basis of lithologic descriptions from about 17,000 well
<br />logs. They estimated an average specific yield of 7
<br />percent for the Sacramento Valley, 8 percent for the
<br />Delta area, and 10 percent for the San Joaquin Valley and
<br />Tulare Basin.
|