Laserfiche WebLink
A12 REGIONAL AQUIFER-SYSTEM ANALYSIS-CENTRAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA <br />limits that an error in estimating their thickness has no <br />effect on the flow-system analysis. <br />WATER-BEARING CHARACTERISTICS OF <br />THE AQUIFER SYSTEM <br />(POST-EOCENE CONTINENTAL DEPOSITS) <br />The post-Eocene continental deposits that constitute <br />the Central Valley aquifer system contain mostly fluvial <br />deposits and interbedded lacustrine deposits but include <br />some volcanic material. The continental deposits consist <br />predominantly of lenses of gravel, sand, silt, and clay. <br />The numerous lenses of fine-grained (silt, sandy silt, <br />sandy clay, and clay) sediments are distributed through- <br />out the valley and in most places constitute over 50 <br />percent of the total thickness penetrated by wells, as <br />determined from electric logs (Page, 1986). <br />Most of these fine-grained lenses are not areally <br />extensive; however, several major ones were mapped, <br />principally near the axis of the San Joaquin Valley. The <br />most notable is the Corcoran Clay Member (Pleistocene) <br />of the Tulare Formation (Pliocene and Pleistocene), <br />which is part of the modified E-clay of Page (1986) and <br />underlies most of the west side of the San Joaquin Valley. <br />This diatomaceous clay unit underlies an area of approx- <br />imately 5,000 mi2 (Page, 1986) and ranges in thickness <br />from near zero to at least 160 ft beneath the present bed <br />of Tulare Lake (Davis and others, 1959; Page, 1986). The <br />northern extent of the Corcoran Clay Member is not <br />known because of the lack of well data north of Stockton, <br />particularly in the Delta area. A diatomaceous clay <br />similar in composition to that of the Corcoran Clay <br />Member was present in a test hole drilled northwest of <br />Sacramento, and drillers have filed reports showing a <br />diatomaceous clay in several deeper wells north of <br />Stockton (Page and Bertoldi, 1983). Laboratory tests of <br />the clay indicate that it is highly susceptible to compac- <br />tion, like the Corcoran Clay Member; however, the clay <br />was not present in six other test holes northwest of <br />Sacramento, so the full extent of it is not known. <br />The Corcoran Clay Member is important to the hy- <br />draulics of the aquifer system in that prior to develop- <br />ment it acted as an effective confining unit. However, the <br />drilling of large-diameter wells through the Corcoran and <br />the practice of perforating wells both above and below it <br />have made the present effectiveness of the Corcoran as a <br />confining unit questionable. <br />In the basis of drillers' logs, electric logs from gas wells <br />and the water wells, plus information from seven U.S. <br />Geological Survey test holes drilled as part of this study, <br />Page (1986) concluded that no extensive fine-grained <br />lenses underlie the Sacramento Valley. However, there <br />are two areas of mostly fine-grained sediments interbed- <br />ded with coarse-grained sediments along the northeast <br />flank of the Sacramento Valley adjacent to and south of <br />Chico (Page, 1986, fig. 8), at depths from 600 to 900 ft, <br />and along the southwest flank of the Sacramento Valley <br />north of Cache Creek in T. 3 N., at depths from about 600 <br />to 2,700 ft (Page, 1986, figs. 8-14). <br />Relating aquifers within the post-Eocene continental <br />deposits to specific formations in the subsurface is <br />difficult. In the valley, investigators use mainly physiog- <br />raphy, weathering characteristics, and soils to map upper <br />Cenozoic formations; however, in the subsurface, espe- <br />cially under saturated conditions, equivalents of surface <br />units cannot be mapped with any certainty because <br />differences in lithology are not apparent. In the Central <br />Valley, then, physical properties of the aquifer materials <br />and the distribution of these properties are more impor- <br />tant than the delineation of formation boundaries to <br />understanding regional and local flow patterns and to <br />quantifying water in storage. The general relations in the <br />Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys among geologic <br />units, hydrologic units, and layers used in the computer <br />simulation of ground-water flow are shown in figure 9. <br />STORAGE COEFFICIENT <br />Storage coefficient is the amount of water that can be <br />released from or added to the ground-water reservoir. It <br />is usually defined as the volume of water an aquifer <br />system releases from or takes into storage per unit <br />surface area of aquifer per unit change in head (Lohman <br />and others, 1972, p. 8). In the zone of water-table <br />fluctuations, the storage coefficient is virtually equal to <br />the amount of water released from storage by gravity <br />drainage, referred to as specific yield. Below the zone of <br />water-table fluctuations, the storage coefficient is the <br />amount of water released by compression of the sedi- <br />ments and expansion of the water. This amount is usually <br />much less than the amount released by gravity drainage. <br />Laboratory values of specific yield and porosity are <br />shown in table 1. For the purposes of uniformity, only <br />reported values obtained by the "sample saturation and <br />drainage" method described by Johnson (1967, p. D5) <br />were used in table 1. In general, sand yields more water <br />from gravity drainage than fine-grained deposits like silt <br />and clay, even though the porosities are nearly the same. <br />The fine-grained deposits usually have much smaller <br />specific-yield values because the tiny pores do not drain <br />readily. <br />Williamson and others (1989, table 7) used specific- <br />yield values for aquifer materials similar to those shown <br />in table 1 and then estimated an aggregated specific yield <br />for the first few hundred feet of saturated sediment on <br />the basis of lithologic descriptions from about 17,000 well <br />logs. They estimated an average specific yield of 7 <br />percent for the Sacramento Valley, 8 percent for the <br />Delta area, and 10 percent for the San Joaquin Valley and <br />Tulare Basin.