Laserfiche WebLink
GROUND WATER IN THE CENTRAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA A31 <br />The relation of storage and hydraulic head in a com- <br />pacting aquifer system is shown in figure 20. Note that <br />head declines are rapid when pumped water is derived <br />from elastic storage but are slow when it is derived from <br />inelastic storage. <br />Water derived from compaction has varied from a few <br />percent to more than 60 percent of the pumped water in <br />the subsiding areas. These differences were attributed to <br />variations in geology and well construction, as discussed <br />in chapter C (Page, 1986), and are summarized here. The <br />percentage of fine-grained deposits within the stressed <br />interval and the mineralogy of these deposits are impor- <br />tant factors. In the Los Banos-Kettleman City area, an <br />area of maximum land subsidence, the highest percent- <br />age of fine-grained deposits anywhere in the San Joaquin <br />Valley lies within the upper 2,000 ft of the aquifer <br />system. Bull (1975, p. F49) suggested that within this <br />area, interlayering of thin-bedded, compressible fine- <br />grained sediments with permeable coarse-grained sedi- <br />ments resulted in rapid and substantial compaction in <br />response to water-level declines. Compaction is less with <br />the same water-level declines in areas of coarse-grained <br />beds. <br />The type of clay mineral present influences subsidence; <br />montmorillonite is highly susceptible to compaction and is <br />the predominant clay mineral in the major subsiding <br />areas of the San Joaquin Valley. Differences in hydraulic <br />head throughout the pumped interval also affect compac- <br />tion; the rate of compaction is less when the water table <br />and artesian head are lowered simultaneously, as in a <br />well that is perforated in both water-table and confined <br />zones. <br />The factors influencing inelastic compaction and land <br />subsidence are summarized in figure 21. Where wells are <br />perforated in confined zones of an aquifer system that <br />contain numerous thin lenses of compressible montmoril- <br />lonite clay, inelastic compaction will be at a maximum. <br />However, where wells tap both water-table and confined <br />zones and much of the perforated section falls within <br />coarse-grained deposits, compaction will be minimal. <br />The measured compaction in relation to head decline at <br />two wells in subsiding areas from 1960 to 1980 is shown <br />in figure 22. At each site, the 1960's were marked by <br />steady head decline and a high rate of compaction. The <br />decrease in ground-water pumpage in the early to middle <br />1970's was accompanied by a steady recovery of water <br />levels and greatly reduced compaction. The resumption <br />of large ground-water withdrawals during the 1976-77 <br />drought was marked by a sharp decline in water levels <br />and a short period of renewed compaction. Ireland and <br />Large <br />head difference-i^ <br />Fine-grained layers; <br /> ^=^=^^1^-=E^-- <br /> ' - . .'.'.- <br /> Sand " ." .-.' ". '. <br />"i Cone of depression . . . <br />mostly montmorillonite clay ~^=^- <br /> _^ <br />.'.-.-'. -. <br />Artesian head <br />(lower sand) <br />Artesian head <br />(lower sand) <br />Sand <br />"~~ ~- .' .. Numerous thin <br />0 " './ : fine-grained lensesSand . . .-.-.-. Of mostly <br />j ;. ' ' ' ' montmorillonite clay <br />I I <br />Sand <br />: . -. -. ' j ]...- .' .'. .-.'.-.'. . <br />Fine-grained layers; <br />little or no <br />montmorillonite clay <br />I I.1 i:i i <br />i i <br />Sand <br />B <br />FIGURE 21. Influence of hydrogeology and well construction on potential for land subsidence. Dashed lines denote perforated <br />sections of wells. A, High potential for subsidence. B, Low potential for subsidence.