Laserfiche WebLink
Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Management Plan <br />Northeastern San Joaquin County Section 1 <br />Groundwater Banking Authority 20 Introduction <br />1 Introduction <br />1.1 Background <br />San Joaquin County is home to approximately 600,000 people and sustains a $1.34 billion <br />agricultural economy. The population is expected to increase to approximately 1.1 million by <br />2030. Water demand in the county is approximately 1,600,000 acre feet per year, 60 percent of <br />which is quenched by groundwater. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has <br />declared the Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin (Basin) "critically overdrafted," indicating <br />that the current rate of groundwater pumping exceeds the rate of recharge and is not <br />sustainable. (DWR, 1980) Based on the San Joaquin County Water Management Plan, the <br />Basin is overdrafted by 150,000 af/yr on average. Long-term groundwater overdraft has <br />lowered the groundwater table by 2 ft/yr in some areas to -70 ft (MSL) and has induced the <br />intrusion of highly saline groundwater into the Basin from the west. Without mitigation, such <br />intrusion will degrade portions of the Basin, rendering the groundwater unusable for municipal <br />supply and irrigation. <br />Failure to address water supply and management needs in Eastern San Joaquin County will <br />ultimately result in severe economic disruptions to the County. Agriculture in San Joaquin <br />County, valued at $1.34 Billion, is already stressed due to declining market prices, rising <br />regulatory, labor, and energy costs, and can ill afford threats to its water supply – a fundamental <br />component of its continued existence. Municipal and industrial users simply must have reliable, <br />high-quality supplies to exist. Loss of supplies to saline intrusion, potential loss of basin yield <br />due to subsidence or simply lack of reliability will translate into business flight, job loss, loss of <br />revenue for public services and general economic decline. Individual agencies in Eastern San <br />Joaquin County have long grappled with declining groundwater levels and unreliable <br />supplemental water supplies. <br />Conversely, long term overdraft has created opportunities for groundwater banking to the <br />benefit of regional and statewide interest. Overuse of groundwater has depleted a substantial <br />portion of stored groundwater in the Basin and has made available volume for potential <br />regulatory storage. It is estimated that at least 1.2 million af, a volume equivalent to Folsom <br />Lake, could be used to store wet year water for use in subsequent dry years. However, to do so <br />would require the monumental task of overcoming the institutional, political, financial, and <br />physical challenges of groundwater banking. <br />Independently, agencies in Eastern San Joaquin County have found it difficult to wield the <br />political and financial power necessary to mitigate the conditions of overdraft. County interests <br />have come to realize that a regional consensus based approach to water resources planning <br />and conjunctive water management increases the chance for success. Regional planning <br />efforts such as the San Joaquin County Water Management Plan (adopted by the County Board <br />of Supervisors in October 2002) and the Mokelumne Aquifer Storage, Recovery Study (MARS <br />Study), and the South County Surface Water Supply Project have proven successful ventures. <br />Since its formation in 2001, the Northeastern San Joaquin County Groundwater Banking <br />Authority (Authority) has employed the consensus based approach in its goal to develop <br />“…locally supported groundwater banking projects that improve water supply reliability in <br />Northeastern San Joaquin County…and provide benefits to project participants and San <br />Joaquin County as a whole.” Collaboration amongst the Authority member agencies has <br />strengthened the potential for broad public support for groundwater management activities as <br />well as the ability to leverage local, State, and federal funds. Table 1-1 lists the member <br />agencies of the Authority.