My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0084717_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
285
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0084717_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2022 12:18:44 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 9:53:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0084717
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
285 S AUSTIN RD
STREET_NUMBER
285
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22802048
ENTERED_DATE
1/12/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
285 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1028
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Management Plan <br />Northeastern San Joaquin County Section 2 <br />Groundwater Banking Authority 45 Hydrogeology <br />downstream of the confluence of the Stanislaus River with the San Joaquin River. The USBR is <br />obligated to meet the Vernalis objectives as a condition of their water right permits. Water <br />quality in the San Joaquin River is influenced by factors such as rain and snow melt runoff, <br />reservoir operations, and irrigation return flows in the San Joaquin River basin. The CVP service <br />area on the Westside of the San Joaquin Valley drain agricultural return flows with significant <br />elevated salt loads into the San Joaquin River. To meet the Vernalis objective, the Bureau of <br />Reclamation supplements flows on the San Joaquin River with releases from New Melones <br />Reservoir on the Stanislaus River by reducing allocations to SEWD and CSJWCD. Despite the <br />take away, the Bureau is unable to meet the Vernalis standard in years when runoff is below <br />average. Eastern San Joaquin County and Delta interests have pushed for the development of <br />water quality objectives up-stream of the confluence of the San Joaquin and Stanislaus Rivers. <br />2.3 Regional Groundwater Flow Patterns <br />Regional groundwater flow patterns have been significantly altered since pre-development <br />conditions. The pre-development and current/post-development groundwater flow patterns are <br />discussed below. <br />2.3.1 Pre-Development Conditions <br />Groundwater was used for agriculture in the Central Valley starting around 1850, prior to which <br />time the groundwater system was in a state of hydrologic equilibrium (Williamson, et. al., 1989). <br />Under equilibrium, or steady-state conditions, groundwater flowed from the natural recharge <br />areas along the perimeter of the valley towards the low areas along the San Joaquin River. The <br />natural groundwater and surface water discharge was through the Delta westward to San <br />Francisco Bay. Under pre-development conditions groundwater gradients within San Joaquin <br />County were likely similar to the topographic gradient, or around 0.0012 ft/ft. <br />2.3.2 Post-Development Conditions <br />Beginning in 1850 the development of groundwater for agriculture expanded rapidly. Within the <br />Central Valley, irrigated agriculture has grown from less than 1 million acres around the turn of <br />the century, to an estimated 7 to 8 million acres at present. Within eastern San Joaquin County, <br />an estimated 800,000 af/yr of groundwater was being extracted by 1993. In Bulletin 118-80, <br />DWR designated the Basin as ‘critical overdrafted’. <br />Figures 2-1 through 2-4 illustrate groundwater table contours for spring and fall 1993 and 1998. <br />The map clearly shows the significant cone of depression east of Stockton. Regional <br />groundwater flow now converges on this low point, with relatively steep groundwater gradients <br />(0.0018 feet/feet) westwards towards the cone of depression, and eastward gradients from the <br />Delta area on the order of 0.0008 feet/feet. The eastward flow from the Delta area is significant <br />because of the typically poorer quality water. <br />2.3.3 Groundwater Level Trends <br />The groundwater level trends illustrate the change in groundwater flow patterns described <br />above. Hydrographs for selected wells and sub-regions are presented in Figures 2-7 through 2- <br />21 and a map of the well locations is shown on Figure 2-22.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.