Laserfiche WebLink
Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Basin Groundwater Management Plan <br />Northeastern San Joaquin County Section 2 <br />Groundwater Banking Authority 66 Hydrogeology <br />Figures 2-9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, and 21 illustrate groundwater levels for selected wells <br />located in and around the principal cone of depression in eastern San Joaquin County. The <br />groundwater levels in these wells clearly illustrate the significant decline in water levels since <br />the 1960s, an average drop of 60 feet. The hydrographs of these wells illustrate average <br />groundwater level drops of around 1.3 feet per year. In general, the lowest groundwater levels <br />were reached in the late 1970s, recovering 10 to 20 feet, but then declined again in the mid- <br />1990s. Wells in this area have a significant seasonal variation of 10 to 20 feet. <br />Figures 2-7, 8, 10, 13, 16, 19, and 20 illustrate groundwater levels for wells located further away <br />from the main cone of depression, primarily further west and north. These wells show a less <br />dramatic drop than the other wells, and more noticeable increase due to the wet years of 1981 <br />through 1983 (total rainfall in 1983 was more than double the long-term average). The seasonal <br />variation in these wells is distinct but not as pronounced as shown on the other hydrographs. In <br />summary, the hydrographs reviewed illustrate the following general patterns: <br />1. In the central part of the County the groundwater table dropped continuously from the <br />1950s and possibly earlier to the mid 1980s. The decline was temporarily reversed due <br />to climatic events. <br />2. In the northern part of the County groundwater table decline continued into the early <br />1990s. <br />3. Starting in the early 1980s a distinct drawdown and recovery cycle appears to have <br />developed. The cycle covers a 10 to 15 year time period, and appears to be driven by <br />climatic conditions more than long-term changes in groundwater use. This recovery and <br />drawdown cycle may indicate that groundwater levels are beginning to equilibrate under <br />current groundwater/surface water use patterns. <br />2.3.4 Groundwater Discharge and Recharge <br />The estimates of groundwater discharge and recharge presented in these sections are based <br />on the modeling conducted by CDM for the San Joaquin County Water Management Plan, and <br />the modeling originally conducted for the American River Water Resources Investigation (AWRI, <br />1996), and updated in 1999 for the Bureau of Reclamation by CH2MHill (CH2MHill, 1999). The <br />results are for the Basin only. <br />2.3.4.1 Groundwater Pumping <br />Groundwater pumping records are not typically available for all wells within the study area. The <br />approach adopted by DWR and other agencies to estimate groundwater withdrawals is based <br />on land use. Figure 2-23 illustrates the ‘simulated’ total agricultural and municipal groundwater <br />pumping for the model domain. Average annual groundwater withdrawal for the period from <br />1970 to 1993 for the Eastern San Joaquin portion of the model was 850,000 af. <br />2.3.4.2 Lateral Outflow <br />Under predevelopment conditions, lateral outflow from the Basin discharged to the San Joaquin <br />River and the Delta area. For the period from 1970 to 1993, the net flow was positive, indicating <br />no net groundwater outflow from study area. <br />2.3.4.3 Deep Percolation <br />The amount of water from natural and human activities that reaches the groundwater table is <br />referred to as deep percolation. Deep percolation is the net of rainfall, applied irrigation water,